At the risk of being misunderstood, may I suggest that you include this viewpoint along with your link to "inerrancy- is it real or imagined?"(paraphrased of course).
I don't use the word inerrant. I use "true"/"the truth".
P.S. ;^)
Your point is moot.
But you could have saved yourself the trouble if you were a careful reader. You skimmed over this little tid-bit in my previous post on "inerrancy":