Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: smokeyb

Herman Cain said he didn’t know what he would do about Iraq and Afghanistan. He’d decide once he became president and had more information. In one sense, it’s a safe answer, but it doesn’t make me feel confident him as a candidate. I’m not going to vote for someone who won’t give an answer on this question.

Santorum was the clear winner. He was consistent in his answers, didn’t come across as a flip-flopper (as Pawlenty did several times), and showed that he was not afraid to go after Obama head-on. He also showed some class, following Reagan’s 11th commandment in not taking the bait and going after Gingrich’s personal failures.

His closing statement was the strongest. His comment that he has taken on his own party (including Bush) will resonate with voters.


11 posted on 05/05/2011 7:59:42 PM PDT by Paul Kib (http://whattoreadtoday.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Paul Kib

Oh, and Ron Paul....if it’s anything like CPAC, he packed the audience with his college-age libertarian groupies, lining them up with free tickets. Romney did the same thing. It’s how straw polls are won.


18 posted on 05/05/2011 8:02:59 PM PDT by Paul Kib (http://whattoreadtoday.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Kib

I disagree about Cain’s answer on Iraq and Afghanistan. After all, we have a President now who said very clearly what he would do as a candidate and guess what — he’s done JUST THE OPPOSITE on every single foreign policy issue.

Clearly Cain will be a domestic policy candidate and would pick a VP or other advisors for foreign policy. But he loves American and won’t apologize and won’t prosecute CIA investigators.


21 posted on 05/05/2011 8:03:53 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (American Thinker Columnist / Rush ghost contributor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Kib
Herman Cain said he didn’t know what he would do about Iraq and Afghanistan. He’d decide once he became president and had more information. In one sense, it’s a safe answer, but it doesn’t make me feel confident him as a candidate. I’m not going to vote for someone who won’t give an answer on this question.

That is honesty ! How could he possibly give another answer, he is not privy to the intelligence.

78 posted on 05/05/2011 8:39:41 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Kib

I dont know if Santorum will get the nomination or even win a single primary but no one will work harder and campaign harder than him. His 2006 effort was impressive but unfortunately it was just a bad year for republicans.


84 posted on 05/05/2011 8:53:10 PM PDT by fkabuckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Kib
Santorum was the clear winner. He was consistent in his answers, didn’t come across as a flip-flopper

You obviously missed a question. Santorum was asked about Medicare Part D because he had voted for it and later said he regretted that vote. In his answer, Santorum responded that he wanted to replicate the Medicare Part D experience. How is that not a flip-flop? You vote for it, you denounce the vote, you say, "I was right all along, let's do more!"

Estimating from the live thread, it was asked around 30 minutes into the debate.

153 posted on 05/06/2011 2:11:48 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Stay focused: Debt, Deficits & Immigration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson