Posted on 05/07/2011 2:13:23 PM PDT by Brown Deer
thanks for that...I can’t read through Orly’s site but that’s probably true.
DR. ORLY TAITZ ESQ
29839 SANTA MARGARITA PKWY, STE 100
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA 92688
ph. 949-683-5411
Loretta J. Fuddy, ACSW, MPH
Director of Health
state of Hawaii Department of Health
1250 Punchbowl str., Room 325
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
05.07.2011
REQUEST TO ACCESS ORIGINAL 1961 TYPEWRITTEN BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA (IF IT EXISTS) UNDER HAWAII UNIFORM INFORMATION PRACTICES ACT OF 1975
Dear Ms. Fuddy
My name is Dr. Orly Taitz. I am an attorney representing some 200 members of the U.S. military, state representatives from a number of states and former US ambassador to the United Nations, ambassador Alan Keyes. I am currently conducting a number of legal actions, relating to the authenticity of Mr. Obama’s vital records. On April 25, 2011 you sent a letter to Mr. Barack Obama with enclosures, stating that those enclosures represent his original Certificate of Live Birth and not a computer generated copy. (Exhibit 6) Your letter and enclosures were posted on the web site of the WhiteHouse.gov.
Computer image posted on the official web site of the White House, White House.gov is clearly not a true and correct copy of the original type written Certificate of Live Birth issued in 1961. It is clearly a computer generated image, showing multiple signs of computer manipulation and alteration. (Exhibit 1)
A copy is supposed to look as an original document, particularly a certified copy. In 1961 Birth Certificates or Certificates of Live Birth were issued on White paper. Please see the attachment Exhibit 2, a certified copy of the original Certificate of Live Birth of one Susan Nordyke, born August 5 1961 in the same hospital in Hawaii. While there are about 70 different areas on this document, that point to the fact, that document released by Obama is an altered multilayered computer image and not a correct and true copy of the original document, the most obvious are as follows:
1. Nordyke BC is on a white paper, that is turning yellow with aging. Obama BC is on the green safety paper, which was not used in 1961
2. Nordyke BC has a clearly defined border. Obama BC does not have a clearly defined border, particularly on the right side of the document.
3. Nordyke BC has an embossed seal. Obama BC does not have a seal.
4. Nordyke BC states that it is a certified copy of the original document. Obama BC has a notation, that it is a true copy or an abstract. If it is not a true copy of the original birth certificate, but rather an abstract, than it completely negates your statement, that it is a certified copy of an original Certificate of Live Birth. As you well known, an abstract, can be just about anything. It can be a computer copy of grandma’s recollection, not supported by any corroborating evidence.
5. Please, see an affidavit from an expert attesting to the fact, that this document is a computer multilevel creation. Exhibit 5 One can see that the signatures and dates have partially ink and partially computer generated images.
This is particularly alarming in light of the following facts :
a. Selective service certificate shows Obama using Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425 Exhibit 3
b. Social security administration shows that this number was never assigned to him. Exhibit 4
We have the most egregious crime ever perpetrated upon the citizens of the
United States of America: an individual occupying the position of the president and Commander in chief, while using an invalid Social Security number, invalid Selective Service Certificate and an altered Birth certificate. Anyone aiding and abetting in this endeavor is guilty of aiding and abetting Social Security fraud, elections fraud and possibly being part of RICO.
Based on all of the above I respectfully demand an access for me and my forensic document experts to the original typewritten birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama, allegedly generated in Kapiolani hospital, signed by Dr. David A Sinclair and issued and certified on August 8 1961 in the state of Hawaii by the registrar U.K. Lee.
The issue of privacy cannot be raised by Mr. Obama, as he waived any privacy claims by releasing what he claims to be the true and correct copy of the original birth certificate. At this time, the only concern is not privacy, but authenticity of what was released. At this time at issue is the national security of the United States of America, as it is endangered more than ever by one occupying the position of the President of the United States and the Commander in Chief while using an invalid Social Security number, invalid Selective Service Certificate and an altered birth certificate (or Certificate of Live Birth)
Additionally I demand clarification, whether document released by Mr. Obama, is indeed the true and correct copy of the document, that you gave to his attorney, Ms. Corley.
Sincerely,
Dr. Orly Taitz. ESQ
cc Inspector General Department of Justice
cc Conressman Issa, Chairman of House Oversight committee
cc Congressman Smith, Chairman of House Committee on the Judiciary
cc Congressman Rogers, chairman of subcommittee on Social Security
cc Public Integrity Unit Department of Justice
Yes.
I’m drawing a blank at the moment and I have to go to church. I may remember and will post or, hopefully, someone still reading this thread will chime in with it.
John Paul Ludwig
The reason this is important, is because there is a similar fact pattern to Obama. Barack Obama is residing today in the White House, using CT SS number 042-68-4425, issued in CT in and around March 1977 to an elderly individual named John Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890, who is presumed dead and whose death was either never reported to the SS administration or reported and deleted from the database by someone.
I have no actual source for this scuttlebut.
A Hawaiian who actually DOESN’T believe that Obama was born in Hawaii. Amazing. Next we might actually get an investigation in the House of Representatives against this fraudster.
The question that has always been in my mind, why did Percy Sutton, Khalid al-Mansour, Bill Ayers try to get Zero into Harvard? With Saudi Prince bin Talal who paid for his acceptance, education, Harvard Law Review position there?
Why would some no-name from HI get all this? Never made sense. So had to be something special either they saw in the beginning or his other connections? But would make sense if he’s related to X, celebrity “special” status. Lord knows he acts like it all day.
But another question is if Stanley Ann wasn’t pregnant, why did she stop attending Univ of Hawaii after Fall 1960? She’s not enrolled Spring ‘61 and not accounted for til back at old stomping grounds, Mercer Island for school there. What is very strange is no pregnant or infant pictures of Zero with mom. But perhaps the baby was getting raised by “Granny” Sarah in his homeland.
Thanks justiceseeker93.
Fred is legit.
g_w
“...Why would some no-name from HI get all this? Never made sense. So had to be something special either they saw in the beginning or his other connections? But would make sense if he’s related to X, celebrity “special” status...”
FAMILY:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2716654/posts?page=82#82
“...On the passport details for the Kenyan, his sponsor is shown as the AFRICAN-AMERICAN INSTITUTE. In their 1976 newsletter it clearly shows that PERCY SUTTON and BETTY SHABBAZZ are involved with the institute...so I would NOT jump to any conclusions as to who paid for Harvard...”
http://www.aaionline.org/files/1976_AAI_Annual_Report.pdf
Fred is legit.
Sorry, but when someone so pointedly invalidates my intimate and personal knowledge of a subject, such as Fred has, they'll get no quarter from me.
He even posted photographic evidence which completely proved the validity of my assertion, then went on to insult me and my family.
The man's a jerk. Plain and simple.
Bowing out now.
No prob, GW. Freepers mix it up sometimes. Part of the price of free speech.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.