SunkenCiv
Since Jan 3, 2004

view home page, enter name:

·

Gods, Graves, Glyphs

Gods, Graves, Glyphs ·

Catastrophism

Catastrophism ·

The Wry Incision

The Wry Incision ·

X-Planets

X-Planets


(updated November 6, 2013)


  • Report: Ted Cruz could ride Tea Party support to White House
    [birther trolls stay out! JimRob]
    FYI: This website supports tea party constitutionalist Ted Cruz for president to the hilt. Those who join with the libs, RINOS and GOP-e to openly work against us on this will be considered our political foe and will be treated accordingly. FR will not be used to harm his chances. Take your birther trolling elsewhere.
    [111 posted on 11/01/2013 9:51:04 PM PDT by Jim Robinson]
  • Statement by the founder of Free Republic
    I posted the following statement to our front page in response to the criticism I'm receiving lately as to not being fair and balanced and perceived mistreatment of trolls and assorted malcontents. Got news for all, I'm NOT fair and balanced. I'm biased toward God, country, family, liberty and freedom and against liberalism, socialism, anarchism, wackoism, global balonyism and any other form of tyranny. Hope this helps.

    In our continuing fight for freedom, for America and our constitution and against totalitarianism, socialism, tyranny, terrorism, etc., Free Republic stands firmly on the side of right, i.e., the conservative side. Believing that the best defense is a strong offense, we (myself and those whom I'm trying to attract to FR) support the strategy of taking the fight to the enemy as opposed to allowing the enemy the luxury of conducting their attacks on us at home on their terms and on their schedule.

    Therefore, we wholeheartedly support the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive strikes on known terrorist states and organizations that are believed to present a clear threat to our freedom or national security. We support our military, our troops and our Commander-in-Chief and we oppose turning control of our government back over to the liberals and socialists who favor appeasement, weakness, and subserviency. We do not believe in surrendering to the terrorists as France, Germany, Russia and Spain have done and as Kerry, Kennedy, Clinton and the Democrats, et al, are proposing.

    As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.
    [Posted on 03/22/2004 6:22:17 PM PST by Jim Robinson]
  • Obama the capitalism-hating, liberty-hating,
    America-hating Marxist must be destroyed!!
    As much as I detest what the Republican party has become, there is no other party on this earth that can come anywhere close to accomplishing what must be accomplished to keep America from spiraling down a Marxist/communist toilet... All Republicans, independents, grassroots conservatives, tea party members, moderates, Reagan democrats, Christians, Jews, life, family, liberty, decency-loving patriots of any stripe must work like the blazes for the next couple of months and then turnout on election day and drag their friends, relatives and co-workers to the polls to vote that communist bastard and as many godless, liberty-hating, capitalism-hating, God-hating, liberal progressive, corrupt Marxist communists bastards the hell OUT as is humanly possible!!
    [Posted on 08/20/2012 6:14:29 AM PDT by Jim Robinson]
  • Victor Davis Hanson: Wall Street 101 [#45]
    It's worth remembering that in 1801, when Jefferson became president, the US national debt was around $100 million, about 10 times annual federal revenues. This was literally "the cost of freedom," and would correspond today to a national debt around $30 trillion. Since our actual national debt is $13+ trillion, the government is in better financial shape today than it was in Jefferson's time. And at the time, Jefferson's number one priority was paying down the national debt. So, how did he do it? How does ANY wise government ever increase its revenues? Yes, that's right! JEFFERSON REDUCED GOVERNMENT SPENDING AND CUT TAXES.
    [Posted on 10/11/2008 5:10:43 AM PDT by BroJoeK]
  • The First Look At Hillary Documents
    The purists, who will stay at home because our candidate couldn't walk on water without getting the soles of his Teva's wet will have gifted us with another Clintoon pillaging.
    [Posted on 01/18/2008 2:22:22 PM EST by Grampa Dave (and check out the tagline there)]
  • Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass. [my tagline]
  • Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass. [my tagline]
  • Rand Paul: Christie Win Shows GOP Has Room for Moderates
    "There's room in the Republican Party for moderates, like Chris Christie. They seem to be the only ones that are winning in the Northeast... The other thing that might happen in the Northeast if we had a little more libertarian-leaning Republicans, they would have a chance in the Northeast. But there's room for moderates, like Chris Christie, and he's got a place in the party."
    [Posted on 11/06/2013 4:19:17 PM PST by Olog-hai]
  • Rand Paul's immigration speech
    ...The Republican Party must embrace more legal immigration.

    Unfortunately, like many of the major debates in Washington, immigration has become a stalemate-where both sides are imprisoned by their own rhetoric or attachment to sacred cows that prevent the possibility of a balanced solution.

    Immigration Reform will not occur until Conservative Republicans, like myself, become part of the solution. I am here today to begin that conversation.

    Let's start that conversation by acknowledging we aren't going to deport 12 million illegal immigrants.

    If you wish to work, if you wish to live and work in America, then we will find a place for you...

    This is where prudence, compassion and thrift all point us toward the same goal: bringing these workers out of the shadows and into being taxpaying members of society.

    Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers.12 million more people assimilating into society. 12 million more people being productive contributors.
    [Posted on 03/19/2013 7:04:07 AM PDT by Perdogg] [but he's not in favor of amnesty, snicker, definition of is is]
  • Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reform
    Latinos, should be a natural constituency for the party, Paul argued, but "Republicans have pushed them away with harsh rhetoric over immigration." ...he would create a bipartisan panel to determine how many visas should be granted for workers already in the United States and those who might follow... [and the buried lead] "Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers...
    [Posted on 04/21/2013 1:52:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie]
  • Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften war stance
    ...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said.
    [Posted on 01/31/2013 5:08:50 PM PST by xzins]
  • Rand Slams Congress for Funding Egypt's Generals: 'How Does Your Conscience Feel Now?'
    Sen. Rand Paul is hammering his fellow senators for keeping billions in financial aid flowing to Egypt's military -- even as Cairo's security forces massacre anti-government activists. [by "anti-government activists" is meant church-burning jihadists]
    [Posted on 08/15/2013 5:44:10 PM PDT by Hoodat]
  • Rand Paul's Really Ignorant Paragraph
    Here's the passage at issue: In the 1980s, the war caucus in Congress armed bin Laden and the mujaheddin in their fight with the Soviet Union. In fact, it was the official position of the State Department to support radical jihad against the Soviets. We all know how well that worked out. Let's leave aside for now the insulting, utterly asinine, sickening, inexcusable use of the phrase "war caucus" to describe those (including Reagan!) who supported the mujaheddin against the Soviets. That word choice alone is almost entirely disqualifying for its purveyor to ever be president. Instead, let's just look at a little history here -- because the ignorance evident in this paragraph is truly astonishing. One would be hard pressed to find even a single historian, whether right, left, or center, who would argue anything other than that the Soviet failure in Afghanistan was not just a huge factor, but probably an essential one, in the Soviets' ultimate loss of the Cold War. The mujaheddin did much to help bleed the Soviets dry, at a comparatively negligible cost to the United States (for smuggled military hardware and some intelligence). "We all know how well that worked out," said Sen. Paul, dismissively, of the work of our "war caucus" to support the mujaheddin. Yes, we do: It played a key role in helping us win the Cold War. Anybody who doesn't understand that is either foolish or invincibly ignorant. Second, it is a myth that the United States "armed bin Laden." False, false, false. It is also a falsehood to say that bin Laden was a major player within the mujeheddin or in the anti-Soviet war effort at all. Finally, it is false even to say that the Afghani effort against the Soviets was primarily, or even largely, about "jihad." It was a defensive effort against armed invaders, not an offensive effort by "radicals" in the name of Allah.
    [Posted on 02/09/2013 7:33:41 AM PST by LSUfan]
  • Redstate.com bans new Ron Paul supporters
    If Ron Paul supporters wish to spam attack FR, our members, our Commander-in-Chief, our war effort, etc, please feel free to do it elsewhere. Antiwar activism is no more welcome on FR than is abortion activism, gay rights activism, gun control activism or any other leftist/socialist cause.
    [Posted on 10/23/2007 10:41:04 PM PDT Jim Robinson]
  • Frank Rich on the National Circus: Cuccinelli's Near-Win Says More Than Christie's Landslide [Posted on 11/06/2013 4:17:26 PM PST by nickcarraway]
  • Geraldo Rivera declares himself a 'moderate Republican' as he eyes U.S. Senate run
    One day after announcing on his radio show that he is "truly considering" running in 2014 for the U.S. Senate seat now held by New Jersey's Frank Lautenberg, Rivera amped up his message today in a television interview and a column on the Fox News Latino website... a moderate Republican who is fiscally conservative but also supports gay marriage and Roe v. Wade...
    [Posted on 02/01/2013 5:49:11 PM PST by randita]

U.S. National Debt Clock (thanks RightWhale for the link):

U.S. National Debt Clock

Saw this term on Facebook, tried to link it, and it was gone!

Ineptocracy Ineptocracy Cannot manage a newsletter, cannot manage a country

a few more search hits: