I haven’t seen any strong evidence of modification, and I’ve seen all the claims. I disagree that there is such evidence in the claims made.
Now what?
I didn’t say necessarily that the content or meaning of the image was modified. To say that I would have to see the original document that was delivered to Obama by the state of Hawaii, or have a report from someone I trust (emphatically NOT a member of the MSM) who has seen it.
That’s not likely to happen.
It took three years to get any long form certificate (real or not) out of Obama, and it was Trump and the threat of Corsi’s book that got that much of a response from him.
All I can say with certainty was that the digital file containing the image was modified (or more correctly, processed) to the point at which there are obvious anomalies in what you see (if you choose to look).
No one has yet to offer a clear explanation or demonstration of how those anomalies could have been produced as an innocent byproduct of scanning the physical document and converting it to the pdf format, with or without OCR processing.