Skip to comments.
Veteran Status Debate
Flopping Aces ^
| 06-03-11
| CJ
Posted on 06/04/2011 11:17:42 AM PDT by Starman417
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Starman417
If you served in Vietnam during time of war and you would be a Vietnam Veteran.
If you served in the military during that war but were not stationed in Vietnam, you would be a Vietnam era veteran.
2
posted on
06/04/2011 11:31:48 AM PDT
by
ruesrose
(It's possible to be clueless without being blonde.)
To: Starman417
Of course folks differentiate by war ~ it does make a difference ~ your WWI veterans might have faced poison gas, or known fellows who did. In WWII beach landings were a big item, and airplanes played an enormous role. In Korea there was winter. In the Nam there was rain and heat, and in preparation for possible service there, everybody in the combat arms (the only part of military service that counts eh) "they" made sure EVERYBODY got to train in places where there was lots and lots of rain and heat ~ jus' so's you didn't miss anything.
There's some overlap in ages among the veterans of the different wars, so knowing those differences simply helps folks communicate that much better.
I can't imagine a world where any vet would think it totally unimportant or useful to let folks know what war was going on during his period of service.
3
posted on
06/04/2011 11:32:38 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: ruesrose
One of the differences between WWII and Nam is that if you died in training during WWII you were still identified as a veteran of WWII. Folks who died in training during Nam were accorded only the distinction of being "another dead Viet Nam Era Veteran"
Doesn't seem fair ~ dead is dead ~ and whether you reached the battle field or died along the way in training, it was certainly YOUR WAR.
None of those guys who died in training are on the Memorial.
4
posted on
06/04/2011 11:35:16 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Starman417
The term “VietNam Era Veteran” is used by the military and government to indicate anybody who served during the VietNam War period. This applies to veterans benefits and such.
5
posted on
06/04/2011 11:42:54 AM PDT
by
G-Bear
(Always leave your clothes and weapons where you can find them in the dark.)
To: Starman417
My father signed up for the army as soon as he turned 18 to fight in World War II. While he was still in basic training, Japan surrendered. Although he went on to spend 12 years in the military and was part of the occupation force that was in Japan after the war, he never considered himself a World War II veteran. However, the military did consider him a Veteran because the war was still going on when he enlisted. In fact the grave marker the military supplied when he died in 2000 says World War II veteran on it.
6
posted on
06/04/2011 11:44:09 AM PDT
by
apillar
To: ruesrose
So what if you were stationed in Thailand, Formosa, Philippines etc. in support of the war flying or otherwise?
Maybe lots of TDY from the states to Vietnam?
I guess it kind of depends on what your DD214 says.
7
posted on
06/04/2011 11:45:22 AM PDT
by
yetidog
To: Starman417
Any time the left can elevate WWII service over Vietnam service, they do.
8
posted on
06/04/2011 11:49:28 AM PDT
by
ansel12
( JIM DEMINT "I believe [Palins] done more for the Republican Party than anyone since Ronald Reagan")
To: Starman417
I’m a Cold War Era veteran aka just a vet.
To: Starman417
This seems like a shallow article to me. I guess people need to make up stuff for something to write about.
10
posted on
06/04/2011 12:04:54 PM PDT
by
mountainlion
(A nation that forgets it's past has no future. WinstonChirchill)
To: Starman417
The military makes it pretty simple: If you fulfilled the requirements to be awarded a campaign ribbon/medal, you are a veteran of that campaign i.e. European theater ribbon (WWII) Korean service (Korean war) Vietnam campaign medal (Vietnam) etc.
My wife (served 1966-1969) considers herself a Vietnam war era veteran as she was not awarded the campaign ribbon/medal.
11
posted on
06/04/2011 12:06:19 PM PDT
by
oneolcop
(Lead, Follow or Get the Hell Out of the Way!)
To: ruesrose; All
“If you served in Vietnam during time of war and you would be a Vietnam Veteran.
If you served in the military during that war but were not stationed in Vietnam, you would be a Vietnam era veteran”
That is exactly the way service organizations including The American Legion, the VFW, and AMVETS view it. You cannot join any of those organizations if your DD 214 (which a member presents for verification) doesn’t state that. The exception is the VFW where you must have served overseas and issued an overseas campaign ribbon issued during that era.
I am a member and have been an officer in the Legion and the VFW because I served in time of a declared conflict (Korea) and met those requirements .
12
posted on
06/04/2011 12:09:25 PM PDT
by
mosesdapoet
("To punish a province Let it be ruled by a professor " Frederick The Great paraphrased)
To: Starman417
Perhaps the distinction should be those actually in the combat area, and those supporting them, such as the sailors of the coast, aircrew bringing in support, vs. those well removed from the theater. Out first segeant told us within minutes of setting boots on the ground at Danang, "you are now Vietnam veterans". Took a few rocket attacks to feel like one though.
Those that spent their time in Germany (or like a buddy, embassy guard in Copenhagen) are "era" veterans. Hard to call a guy that chased chicks in Denmark for 3 years a "Vietnam Veteran".
To: Starman417
So all the WACs, WASPs, and WAVs who served during World War II — many of whom lost their lives moving aircraft around the country, for example — aren’t World War II vets in your book?
Bah. You’re wrong.
14
posted on
06/04/2011 12:25:28 PM PDT
by
Blue Ink
To: Starman417
Personally I think, and probably moreso now than during WWII, is if you got combat pay then you’re a veteran of the conflict.
15
posted on
06/04/2011 12:41:02 PM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(Socialism works great until capitalism hits a rough spot)
To: Blue Ink
I served on a nuke sub during the vietnam war, does that make me a vietnam vet?
16
posted on
06/04/2011 12:43:05 PM PDT
by
brivette
To: Blue Ink
I served on a nuke sub during the vietnam war, does that make me a vietnam vet?
17
posted on
06/04/2011 12:43:15 PM PDT
by
brivette
To: ruesrose
Would a WWII vet who spent the war working at the Pentagon be a WWII vet or a WWII era vet?
Would a vet who worked - say - at 8th Army HQ in Tokyo and never set foot in Korea be a Korean War vet or a Korean War era vet?
18
posted on
06/04/2011 12:48:03 PM PDT
by
quadrant
(1o)
To: Starman417
For whatever it’s worth, my husband makes it clear that he enlisted, “...too late for Viet Nam.”
19
posted on
06/04/2011 1:04:49 PM PDT
by
Silentgypsy
(You know if I donÂ’t remember IÂ’m gonna forget.)
To: Starman417
If a person was in the military during the Viet Nam War but never was ordered in country should refer to themselves or others in that situation as Viet Nam ERA veterans to distinguish themselves from those who did go to Viet Nam.
I was in the service then as well as during the first gulf war..I did not deploy in either effort but from the state side I was very much in support as well as when I was in Okinawa during Viet Nam..so for me I just say I am a Veit Nam ERA veteran, my husband is a Viet Nam Veteran who served two tours,
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson