Well, the more the merrier but what the hell did Dooley think Obama's 'idealistic promises' were in 2008?
“Youth” see the “stuff” that people have who are older and have paid their dues.
They either don’t understand the paying dues part, or they simply don’t want to pay their dues to get the “stuff”.
The left plays on this, touting “fairness”, but in reality, the implied promise is “we’ll take their stuff and give it to you”, and mostly the “we’ll take” part appeals to [young] human nature.
Well, the more the merrier but what the hell did Dooley think Obama's 'idealistic promises' were in 2008?
The problem with "idealistic promises" is they lead to "good intentions" which inevitably result in "unintended consequences."