I heard one of the jurors being interviewed by Greta van S. on FOX and she seemed quite intelligent. She reasoned that the prosecutor gave the jury no supportable evidence that a murder had been committed by the defendant so, much as they would have favored a guilty finding, they had to go with not guilty. My opinion of the whole matter is that there would have been no jury and probably no trial at all if Casey Anthony had been truthful from the beginning and only she knows what happened to her daughter. Therefore, Casey Anthony deserved a guilty verdict. IMO water boarding for liar and coward Casey and all of her lying family would have gotten to the truth early on. Justice was not served by this verdict no matter how members of that jury choose to interpret their decision to free the main culprit in the death of her two year old defensless daughter, Caylee Anthony.
Oh my gosh. You would kill her because she lied? Your version of justice sounds much like vigilante thinking.
Aggravated manslaughter requires no premeditation. The jury COULDN’T even try to put 2 and 2 together. It is a travesty. I would ask that jury you couldn’t find murder then why not the lessor charges? I know why, to discuss and reason through them would have been HARD.