Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

Wow how blinded must one be to give Sarah a pass on this of all issues.

There were TWO people on the planet who would definitely have standing to challenge the usurper’s eligibility. Traitor McCain was one - guess who the other was. Palin completely sold us out on this.


64 posted on 07/16/2011 8:07:20 PM PDT by 83Vet4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 83Vet4Life

You are dead wrong.

Only the Presidential candidate could be said to have that particular standing. Palin won no electorial contest to be the vice presidentian candidate, thus her position generated no such standing.


72 posted on 07/16/2011 8:30:05 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: 83Vet4Life
Wow how blinded must one be to give Sarah a pass on this of all issues. There were TWO people on the planet who would definitely have standing to challenge the usurper’s eligibility. Traitor McCain was one - guess who the other was. Palin completely sold us out on this.

Three people - Hillary would have standing, too. If Obama was ineligible, she would have been the Democratic nominee.

And Hillary is heavily linked to the legal challengers to Obama's elibibility - but she won't give the suits standing by filing them on her own behalf.

I wonder why. Could it be for the same reason she got her butt tossed to the the curb in the first place? Her ham-handed fingerprints are, as usual, everywhere.

75 posted on 07/16/2011 8:33:24 PM PDT by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson