[LeGrande]

Are you suggesting that we can define a fundamental cosmological reference frame for energy propagation that is outside God's laws or are you suggesting that any and all scientific observations are only witness to God's glory?

Hmm, outside God's laws? I would prefer to state that they prove that an omnipotent God can't exist.

You don't suppose that the usual suspects are going to bitch and whine about this because God simply said; "Let there be light" do you?

They can't even get the proper sequence right in Genesis. Making light, separating light from darkness, then making two lights in the sky. They will bitch and whine, but it will be fun watching them lament.

[Natural Law]

"They can't even get the proper sequence right in Genesis."

Genesis was not intended to be a science or history book. The fundamentals of physics necessary to explain creation were impossible to communicate to the neolithic nomads who received this portion of the revealed Word. Regardless of the wishes and claims of many, Genesis does not attempt to explain HOW God created the universe, it only proclaims THAT He did.

[tpanther]

Back to the can’t get this or that right in Genesis?

You’re right Mind-numbed robot, LaGrande expends a profound amount of time and energy obsessing over that which doesn’t even exist and gets all twisted up with others beliefs.

LaGrande, do you recall several posts back about being unable to understand the Bible if you are arrogantly reaching pre-determined conclusions of your own? No matter how well you understand the (English) language or words?

You simply won’t EVER understand the spirit of God if you demand to deny Him.

And make no mistake, He will give you your free will and your self-deception is yours as long as you demand feeding it.

You might be better served in concerning yourself over your own lamentations!