Posted on 09/25/2011 12:42:05 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
Don’t you think you should ping someone when you’re referring to them?
What a shame you were doing so well. Back on the .... List.
:)-
Yes, that was a significant mistake, although I'd characterize that as foreign policy inexperience. What about with regard to your claim that he's unable to navigate the task of making government work?
I wouldn’t have to comment on Palin threads if there was not a constant bashing of good people. My foray into this thread started after Palin supporters started in on Cain with the Lib talking points. Cain is a solid Conservative and has every capability to be a fine President.
There's a reason you're the Chief Druid of Trollhenge, my brother. You make an excellent point.
Oops, thought I did. Magritte, meet Norm; Norm, meet magritte. Check comment 299, I thought I added your name.
I love the Civil War lessons. And I echo your call “Wait Sarah wait”. She truly knows what she is doing.
I wait anticipating with pleasure Sarah call to “Unleash Hell”. I plan to be among the minions of patriot “rebels” giving that heart quaking “rebel yell”, RUN SARAH RUN!!!
Another worshiper of the fell God Hindendus! Fellow Freeper, let us pray ever harder for the promised day of Zotnarock! ;)
Kidding aside, the paid bots are coming out of the closet across the board. We gotta watch for them and call them on it/let the mods/JR know when it happens. Like the wise kitty said, Freep’em all and let MOD sort’em out!
And it’s going to get worse as the election draws near. Anyone who thinks that FR, the largest and most influential conservative gathering place on the web isn’t filthy with paid trolls and political operatives simply has not thought it through.
BLITZER: Should states or local governments be allowed to the gun situation . . .[gun control]CAIN: Yes
BLITZER: So the answer is yes?
CAIN: Yes. The answer is yes, that should be a state’s decision.
Yikes! This is worse than not knowing what the “right of return” means in Mid-East foreign policy.
The Second Amendment right is protected by a fundamental individual liberty that the federal government is supposed to protect. Keeping arms is an individual’s right and it is the government’s responsibility to protect that right. It is not a state issue. Our rights don’t exist based on the consent and good grace of any one state (or all the states), just as they don’t exist based on the consent and good grace of the federal government. What Cain should have said is that the proper role of the government, whether state or federal, is to refrain from infringing upon our liberties. States may try and pass legislation but they must be consistent with the US Constitution, and they certainly can’t legislate away the Second Amendment.
No question Cain is a funny guy, as he has demonstrated a couple of debates ago in his response to a question, “what would he bring to the WH if elected president?” and he replied: "I would bring a sense of humor to the White House, because America's too uptight!" Yep, I can imagine how the current state of our economy makes all those unemployed and going through hard times really uptight.
Or has not checked posing histories...posting histories do not Lie!
Verily and forsooth...five sooth even! (I’m not a Gore type that believes in ‘sooth’ conservation ...however I may be persuaded on a good global soothing;)
I have a poor academic record but a 3.2 in physics and math doesn’t make me stupid.
Oh, for cryin' out loud. Save your concern for a sermon to the church of PDS.
You and other Palin bashers don't need any other reason to come onto Palin threads, other than the bare mention of her name.
Those "good people' you're supposedly defending, are in the main, known trolls of Palin threads, and do nothing but spout the same tired talking points, ad nauseum, despite the fact that their scripted spittle has been debunked thousands of times on this website.
I know what I'm talking about, because I was an early Palin defender on this website, and have taken more than my share of abuse from those "good people" over the last two and a half years.
You know clyde, it is amazing. I didn’t say one bad thing about Palin on this thread. I just said she needs to say if she is running and get out there and compete.
Her die hard fans are very loyal and they need their reward.
There is no reason to be missing the debates at all. If Palin is so good, she should be able to wipe the floor with her opponents.
Now you know I am a lot more harsh on Perry than I have ever been on Palin. And he deserves it.
Instead, even though I have said nothing bad about Palin, I get piled up on for no good reason.
Perhaps this is “The Unreasonable”;^(
Great visual. I like it!
In this article it is the wag dogging the tail.Sarah will conquer, and without even stooping.
It’s always nice to hear from tinyjeremiah, my personal stalker !!
What a load of bull. Have read the thread and the "Lib talking points" from Palin supporters include, (1) "he is a fine man, but doesn't have a chance on getting the nomination" and, (2) Cain doesn't have executive experience (never held a state, local, or national executive position), or (3) Cain was a board member of the federal reserve, and that might hurt his chances
Don't confuse bashing/liberal talking points with facts posted by reasonable freepers highlighting the obvious weaknesses of a candidate
Here is my gripe: He is dismissive of the details when he speaks, and in government, especially Federal government, there are so many layers of details, authorizations, and mandates in layer after layer of legislation, some going back to the ‘60s that the solution is politically arduous, but he doesn’t accept it.
If he had coattails, like we know Palin will have, perhaps broad legislation may be possible, but it would take a lot.
Don't try to play the innocent victim, when so many of us who know you are watching.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.