Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Since people seem to be confused a little on this point, let me stress that Palin is not suing Random House. Yet.

The point of this letter was to serve notice to Random House that a future lawsuit is possible, even probable, and that they are being reminded of their legal obligations to preserve records.

The INTENT of this letter is encourage Random House to pull the book and issue a retraction & apology rather than risk a lawsuit.

In any event, the statute of limitations (2 years, I believe) gives Palin plenty of time to now ignore this issue until after any 2012 election activities are complete. Even if such a suit were to proceed, Palin’s involvement would be minimal in the early stages.


64 posted on 09/27/2011 4:38:57 AM PDT by kevkrom (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom

“The INTENT of this letter is encourage Random House to pull the book and issue a retraction & apology rather than risk a lawsuit.”

My thoughts exactly. I believe that since Sarah has not been harmed financially by the book she probably is not seeking a serious, punitive, financial award. It’s her family’s good name and honor that has been besmirched and she rightfully deserves a retraction and an apology. Random House is probably going to wait a week or two to milk any possible sales and then pull it.


65 posted on 09/27/2011 5:52:39 AM PDT by gunsmithkat (There is no such thing as Too Many Guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson