How exactly would her freedom to worship and follow her faith be infringed by following the policy she agreed to abide by as a term of employment?
There is no personal approval involved in abiding by facility usage policies. She can (and should!) state her opinion that the policy is wrong but simple refusal to abide by it seems like a clear reason for termination.
It seems to me that Macy’s is clearly within their rights to determine basic rules for what customers are allowed to do and how employees should treat customers on their dime and on their property.
Sorry. Still siding with the employer on this one.
Of course you’re going to side with the employer “on this one.” You are an apologist for the homosexual agenda.
Freedom of religion is inseparable from freedom of conscience. It is unconscionable to most people to allow a man to go into a woman’s restroom, locker room, shower room, changing room, or any other area where women normally expect privacy to be in a state of undress or otherwise attend to intimate bodily functions. Every decent human being has a moral duty to protect the dignity and privacy of other human beings.
Macy’s “policy” is like many other big businesses who have added “sexual orientation” to their “non-discrimination” list. Macy’s policy of “non-discrimination” does not explicitly include allowing men to use the ladies’ restroom or dressing room. This very thing is what those homosexuals at Macy’s were trying to push the envelope on, and is exactly where we will fight them.
While you are certainly entitled to think as you do, siding with Macy’s “on this one” is sheer lunacy, not to mention dead wrong.