[Berlin_Freeper]

The problem with Paultards like you is that you think you can nicely dissect something good about Ron Paul and people will ignore all the rest.

As if that is normal behavior.

It is not.

The fact that I have to tell you that means there is something fundamentally wrong with you.

[Talisker]

The problem with Paultards like you is that you think you can nicely dissect something good about Ron Paul and people will ignore all the rest. As if that is normal behavior. It is not. The fact that I have to tell you that means there is something fundamentally wrong with you.

"Paultards"? How childish. And as for the rest, what a tired reversal of exactly what I just pointed out you shills do. And then, of course, your signature accusation of insanity (which is particularly delicious here because your definition of insanity is - literally - based on the fact that someone disagreed with you PER SE. Tell that to a shrink! LOL!).

Tellya what, little man. I guarantee there is a fundamental - and permanent - difference between you and me.

Absolutely.

Positively.

(P.S. @rokkitapps - read, and learn.)

[tacticalogic]

The problem with Paultards like you is that you think you can nicely dissect something good about Ron Paul and people will ignore all the rest.

What I want to know is why he's the only candidate the Republican Party seems to be able come up with that you can dissect and find that particular "something good".

They can only come up with one hard-core constitutionalist, and it had to be him. Why is that?