In trying to reconstruct the real story, I continue to see the timeline as being very helpful.
There are a handful of tight connections that appear to be credible that fix a lot of the story.
One is the on the record interview by Susan Blake where she tells you that in mid August of 1961 when Barack II was a new born baby, Stanley was taking him to Boston; another is the statement, also on the record, where Joseph’s wife places the black baby and his mother in the Capital Hill boarding house in January of 1961; and a third is the statement by Barack II in an interview with the Harvard Crimson which was widely reported by AP in the National Press in which Barry states that he went to Indonesia when he was “about two”.
The latter proposition needs some understanding. Fundamental theocratic Moslems do not celebrate their birth as the date on which the umbilical cord is cut—instead they celebrate their conception (whether they think they are claiming to know the exact date or are celebrating an assumed date I do not know) as the date of the beginning of their life.
However until later in the Presidential period, Barry celebrated the last week in October. So when we read his “about two” point, we assume that means after about October of 1962; sometime before March of 1963 when Stanley returned to Hawaii and re entered the U of Hawaii, at a time when Barry was no longer to be seen.
Susan’s statement that Stanley was on her way to Boston was widely seen as discrediting all of Susan’s story—in fact, Stanley was departing Seattle to live in Boston with both Barry and Roman at a house in Boston, visited in 1962 by Obama Sr. when he in fact did get to Harvard—a house owned by the sister of Barry’s true father. The 1962 date is the first known date on which Obama Sr. and Stanley can be placed at the same place on the same date.
Those three dates pretty well give you a date guide line to sort out these facts in a fashion not inconsistent with a time line that fits the real story.
Another key established fact which also fixes a part of the timeline is the purported University of Washington transcript for Stanley at the University of Washington in 1961.
That transcript is an outright demonstrated fraud—the first computer form did not come into being until long after 1980; the University’s replacement sent to Jerry Corsi is a two column form which was not used until some time after 1961 and would not have fit the binder’s designed for the three column form which was in fact in use in 1961.
It is undisputable that the claimed transcript is intended as a representation of Stanley Ann Dunham’s presence with a black child on Captial Hill in the 1961 academic year and it is equally certain that she was not there and could not have been there.
Thus someone intending to fit the known facts of a woman using the name Obama, with a black child, present on the Hill in that time frame to Stanley Ann was committed an intentional fraud in the act.
Enter Charlette LeFevre, then the operator of the Seattle Museum of the Mysteries, who conducted walking tours around Capital Hill past the homes of the rich and famous...she had read an article in a Seattle paper that there was gossip going around that the mother of a child named (pick-a-name, zero) was living somewhere in Seattle, so Charlette checks out the local library, finds a Polk from 1960-61 and loh and behold, there's ANNA OBAMA listed at the 13th E Ave address, one of TEN entries, for a property that had been divided into small apartments, listed as Villa Ria Apartments...
One of the listed names was a Joseph T. He had been at the time, married to Mary, but Mary and he were divorced long long ago and she had moved to Alaska...where Charlette tracked her down, she wasn't hard to find, she had been interviewed by the Redoubt reporter in connection with stolen yard signs...
So Charlette rang her. Mary was listed as a local speech therapist. Charlette says, I hear you lived at the same address where our president lived as a baby, I found the address for Anna Obama in the directory...Mary replies, yes, I babysat for ANNA for a few months, while ANNA attended classes.
Charlette writes, MARY REFERRED TO HER AS ANNA, SO THEREFOR IT WAS CLEAR SHE WAS TALKING ABOUT STANLEY ANN DUNHAM.(paraphrased)
Mary told Charlette she babysat when her own daughter, who was born in July 1959, was 18 months of age. So Charlette prints her article and states that the babysitting took place in February or March 1962. Later, when she realizes her mistake, blaming Mary for a poor memory, she edits her own article, printed on her Mystery Museum web pages, and changes the resulting date. But not before a reprint appeared on another local website, in the original form. It's clear as daylight, Mary NEVER claimed to have babysat zero for anyone named Stanley Ann Dunham. The only name Mary used was ANNA. She didn't name the child. The child she babysat IN JANUARY 1961. When her daughter was 18 months of age...
And once Mary had acknowledged ANNA OBAMA she was stuck. She could hardly say, but ANNA was a colored foreign student...
Could she? And you wonder why the university 'transcript' was a fake? I'm thinking ANNA might have been enrolled there, and just like the BC, Stanley Ann Dunham's record from Hawaii was melded to create what was sent to Corsi.