Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: publius321

Yes, McLame (33%) hijacked it from Huck (30%) & Thompson (15%) - the prohibitive favs among conservatives in SC, the decider state.

And now Willard (30%) is scheming to do the same versus Newt (23%), Santorum (19%), and Perry (5%) - the evangelical favs by far and away.


11 posted on 01/09/2012 7:55:40 AM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CainConservative
Yes, McLame (33%) hijacked it from Huck (30%) & Thompson (15%) - the prohibitive favs among conservatives in SC, the decider state.

And now Willard (30%) is scheming to do the same versus Newt (23%), Santorum (19%), and Perry (5%) - the evangelical favs by far and away.

There is a major difference in that far more states follow a more proportional representation rule rather than "winner take all". Winner take all generally applies in a lot of those states only if the winner gets more than 50%. So, if the non-Romney's are splitting that vote and keeping him below 50%, he won't amass a huge delegate lead the way McCain could in 2008. That greatly increases the likelihood of a brokered convention, which is when anti-Romney's could unit behind one candidate.

52 posted on 01/09/2012 9:07:55 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson