Rick Santorum is a nice guy with Christian morals. As such, that should not be the only qualification nor sole determinant to be President under the present circumstance.
This is a political race to see who will be the best candidate to take on and bring down the Marxist-Leninist Muslim running for a second term in the White House.
So-called Christians who are opposed to Newt Gingrich becasue “he is a serial adulterer” - and I have spoken to a plethora of such on Free Republic - are missing the big picture here: this is not a contest about who has or has not sinned in the past.
Mitt Romney is the choice of the Globalists in the Reoublican Party because they think he is malleable. None of them give a rat’s arse about morality, exept to give it lip service.
BHO2 is the choice of the Global Social Justice league. They too, chose Obama because he is malleable. All they want is world-wide Communist domination.
Neither group above has any concern for the Bible carrying, gun owning common man and woman in this nation, whose main concern is the continuance of their God given rights.
We must change the way Washington, D.C., does business, period.
Newt Gingrich has been expounding on that issue for a very long time. I’ve noticed that Rick Santorum is a follow-along on this issue, but he lacks the fire-in-the-belly of a serious contender like Gingrich.
“Rick Santorum is a nice guy with Christian morals. As such, that should not be the only qualification nor sole determinant to be President under the present circumstance.”
It’s only ever brought up as a qualifier. I don’t see anyone going out and saying that because he’s a nice guy and a Christian that this is an asset.
It is an asset. The fact that he has a family, and that he stuck with them is an asset. It demonstrates biblical leadership, remember that quote about bishops - where a man who does not control his own house is unfit to lead the church.
Newt doesn’t have that. That’s the problem. If Newt isn’t fit to lead a prayer in your parish, then how is he fit to lead America?
“This is a political race to see who will be the best candidate to take on and bring down the Marxist-Leninist Muslim running for a second term in the White House.”
Which is why we need to support the candidate who espouses what we believe, not capitulate by picking the guy the media tells us “can win”. No, we need to pick the one closest to what we believe.
“So-called Christians who are opposed to Newt Gingrich becasue “he is a serial adulterer” “
Yeah, he is a serial adulterer. And I’m proud that you are calling me a ‘so-called Christian.’ It’s a badge of honor.
“this is not a contest about who has or has not sinned in the past.”
It goes back to biblical leadership. People want a candidate who meets this list of qualifications and Newt falls short. Wayy short.
“Neither group above has any concern for the Bible carrying, gun owning common man and woman in this nation, whose main concern is the continuance of their God given rights.”
Last I checked we did care. Or maybe we don’t care anymore. I’m not sure. Calling people so-called Christians for holding Newt to his record is sort of an Alinsky tactic isn’t it?
“Newt Gingrich has been expounding on that issue for a very long time. I’ve noticed that Rick Santorum is a follow-along on this issue, but he lacks the fire-in-the-belly of a serious contender like Gingrich.”
Yeah, that ‘fire in the belly’ to ‘change the system’, is why Newt resides in McLean, VA, and has been in there most of his adult life.
Yeah, real ‘outsider’ we have going here. We had an outsider, Cain. Remember him? Now we just have a pick between the super insider - Newt, and a lesser insider in Santorum.
If you really believe that Newt is not a beltway insider after 30 years there, you’re in for a bad surprise.