Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich urges rivals to drop out
http://harndenblog.dailymail.co.uk ^ | January 18, 2012 | rocky88

Posted on 01/18/2012 6:21:59 AM PST by rocky88

Buoyed by his strong debate performance in Myrtle Beach, Newt Gingrich has called his rivals to drop out of the race because "consolidating into a Gingrich candidacy" would "virtually guarantee victory" in the South Carolina primary and stop Mitt Romney becoming the Republican nominee.

Making the case to a crowd of almost 200 in an art gallery in the old railroad junction town of Florence, South Carolina he said: "If you look at the polling, I’m the only conservative who realistically has a chance to be the nominee.

(Excerpt) Read more at harndenblog.dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: anticonstitution; election; gingrich; neocon; newt; newtgingrich; rino; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last
To: kabar

Pride cometh before a fall.


41 posted on 01/18/2012 6:55:26 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rocky88; patriot08
FReeper patriot08 had an interesting list of why Santorum is NOT a strong conservative anymore ...LONGER LIST HERE

I chose just a few of those to look up, and she's right!
Here is what I found on those (my findings indented)

Santorum: Voted to impose a uniform federal tax mandate on states to force them to allow convicted , rapists, arsonists drug kingpins and all other ex-convicts to vote in federal elections.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00031

Luckily, this amendment FAILED because only 31 senators supported it, but LOOK at the company Santorum kept:
Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Cleland (D-GA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Corzine (D-NJ), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Dayton (D-MN), Yea
DeWine (R-OH), Yea
Durbin (D-IL), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Yea
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Jeffords (I-VT), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Miller (D-GA), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Reed (D-RI), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Santorum (R-PA), Yea
Sarbanes (D-MD), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Yea

Santorum: VOTED AGAINST HIRING AN ADDITIONAL 1,000 BORDER PATROL AGENTS, paid for by reductions in state grants.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00179

HERE is just a subset of the most well-known DEMS that Santorum sided with...
Biden (D-DE), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Clinton (D-NY), Nay
Corzine (D-NJ), Nay
Dayton (D-MN), Nay
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Durbin (D-IL), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Jeffords (I-VT), Nay
Kennedy (D-MA), Nay
Kerry (D-MA), Nay
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Murray (D-WA), Nay
Obama (D-IL), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Nay
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Santorum (R-PA), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Nay
Specter (R-PA), Nay

Santorum: Voted AGAINST increasing the number of immigration investigators:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00201

Santorum sided with the DEMS and RINO's here too. Here are just some better known names...

Biden (D-DE), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
Chafee (R-RI), Nay
Clinton (D-NY), Nay
Collins (R-ME), Nay
Dayton (D-MN), Nay
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
Graham (R-SC), Nay
Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Jeffords (I-VT), Nay
Kennedy (D-MA), Nay
Kerry (D-MA), Nay
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Lieberman (D-CT), Nay
McCain (R-AZ), Nay
Murray (D-WA), Nay
Obama (D-IL), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Nay
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Santorum (R-PA), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Nay
Specter (R-PA), Nay

42 posted on 01/18/2012 6:56:22 AM PST by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

The competition will be driven out by lack of funds or votes. He lost in Iowa because of the unbelievable amount of unanswered negative ads. He’s in second place in SC. I’m not selling my soul I’m making a political choice. I’m not voting for Preacher-in- Chief!!!


43 posted on 01/18/2012 6:56:27 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rocky88

Newt as a debater is tops. Obama would be floored if the debates were open and not rehearsed. I can see Newt as causing Obama to stay away from an open debate. But the Newt baggage will be pounded into us ad-nauseam by the MSM. I’m sorry to say that the GOP has no one that will drive the Independents to the polls. IMHO, its not a mater of ABO, its just that there is no fire there to motivate a large turn out. I’m seeing a lot of 2012 Obama stickers here in a largely Republican area. When Palin and Cain were forced out the fire disappeared. What is left is Blaaaaaah. Blaaaah won’t win. Romney, Newt et.al., won’t do it, and the Dems, know it. I would go with Newt though, because he knows how to answer Obama in an open debate. (If he is allowed to. I’m sure Obama’s handlers will try their best to only allow a controlled debate.)


44 posted on 01/18/2012 6:57:57 AM PST by Bringbackthedraft ( WHO YOU ELECT IS NOT AS IMPORTANT AS WHO THEY APPOINT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

I may agree with your opinion of Paul the candidate, but he is well organized and funded and has a devoted following, many of them young. Why should he drop out? He has done well in Iowa and NH, the only places that have actually cast votes.


45 posted on 01/18/2012 7:00:02 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Non of the other candidates have reached perfection on all of the issues you state. Get Real...they’re politicians. The only thing you have to go on is what you personally think they will do now!!


46 posted on 01/18/2012 7:00:32 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

Palin wasn’t forced out ...she failed to get in!!!


47 posted on 01/18/2012 7:02:08 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

you can’t fight those in the gutter by taking the high road every time, isn’t that right rastermaster? This is one of those times. Santorum is a pawn, not a king. same for perry and paul.


48 posted on 01/18/2012 7:02:39 AM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rocky88

The Dems will have a field day with Newt’s baggage. A lot of it will be new to most Americans. Newt has been out of elective office for a dozen years.


49 posted on 01/18/2012 7:04:30 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Well, I would disagree, strongly.


50 posted on 01/18/2012 7:04:30 AM PST by SpringtoLiberty (Liberty is on the march!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

Don’t forget his vote against right to work!


51 posted on 01/18/2012 7:05:54 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft
I’m seeing a lot of 2012 Obama stickers here in a largely Republican area.

Where do you live in FL?

52 posted on 01/18/2012 7:09:08 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SpringtoLiberty

Can you name one republican Ron Paul has worked to elect. If he is a libertarian which he claims to be why isn’t he running as a libertarian. He only becomes a republican every four years when the elections roll around..in other words he is a Republican in name only!!!


53 posted on 01/18/2012 7:10:14 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ontap
The only thing you have to go on is what you personally think they will do now!!

I am worried what they will do now. Newt has said and written that he supports amnesty.

Any legislation that legalizes the status of those who broke our laws by entering our country illegally and allows them to stay is amnesty. We must not only prevent the Democrats and some moderate Republicans from hijacking the meaning of the word amnesty, but the public must be made aware about the true impact of an amnesty. The Heritage Foundation concluded that the cost of amnesty would be $2.6 trillion just for increased entitlement program costs. And the number of additional LEGAL immigrants who would join those who were the recipients of amnesty through chain migration, i.e., family reunification, would approach 70 million over a 20-year period, assuming there are only 12 million illegal aliens. We cannot assimilate such numbers. An amnesty would destroy the United States of America with the stroke of a pen.

54 posted on 01/18/2012 7:13:23 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Which candidate is clean on this issue!


55 posted on 01/18/2012 7:14:58 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Who appointed pro-amnesty Gingrich as the lead conservative?

Well, he appointed himself, of course, because he's just smarter than the rest of us. If you can't appreciate it, then you are the one who is stupid.

Pay no attention to the fact that Gingrich actually finished behind Santorum in 2 of 2 contests so far.

Seriously, though, this type of hotdogging is exactly why Newt turns a lot of people off. Even if he is the star debate performer and the smartest man in the room.

56 posted on 01/18/2012 7:17:05 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

Santorum voted for Sotomayor to the appellate court.


57 posted on 01/18/2012 7:18:28 AM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rocky88

I like a lot of things about Newt, but this whining for everyone else to get out and give him a clear shot is annoying.

Rick Santorum said the same thing recently. Everyone get out, waaa, waaa, you’re taking my votes.

At this VERY early stage in the game, this is premature.

Why are we so sheeplike that we let the media determine that South Carolina or any one state choose our candidates.

The number of electoral votes earned so far is miniscule.

Rick Perry is gaining favorables, while Santorum has shot himself in the foot, groin and every area he can reach as far as I’m concerned.

I like Newt but he’s more than capable of doing or saying something really stupid that will cost him support.

To decide this now with three conservatives left, you want to kick out one of them ??

If you don’t like Newt, and a whole lot of people Do NOT like Newt, do you want to have to settle for Mr. Rogers Santorum with his stupid ideas on social security, pandering to felons on guns and his iffy record in congress?

I don’t.


58 posted on 01/18/2012 7:19:34 AM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Actually, I don't actually think he should drop out. I think he should never have run in the first place.

Ron Paul is not even a Republican, let alone a conservative one.

I know there are 'followers' of Ron Paul who think they're conservatives, but that's a topic for another thread....

59 posted on 01/18/2012 7:21:33 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ontap
Romney, Santorum, and even Perry are better than Newt. Romney has received the endorsement of Kris Kobach, the Kansas Secretary of State who co-authored AZ 1070 and the tough immigration laws in SC and AL. All three states are being sued by the federal government.

NumbersUSA rates the candidates on immigration. Here are the latest ratings.

60 posted on 01/18/2012 7:21:52 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson