OBAMA JUST GOT PUNKED!

giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com ^ | 2012-01-26 | giveusliberty1776

[Scanian]

All the judge had to do was read Obozo’s web site from ‘08 on which 0 stated that he was the son of a British subject-—and thus NOT a NBC.

This judge sounds like a hardline conservative, in which case may God bless him...or some sort of Democrat trickster with something up his sleeve.

[AndyTheBear]

...un-naturalized skin attacks toward?

Just a fine point, but I think you mean un-"natural born" skin? My own less than perfect understanding is that a "naturalized" citizen is one who becomes a citizen through some kind of special allowance...which would apply to Obama if he is a citizen at all.

[The Wizard]

May this truly happen....how many state would follow....

[SaraJohnson]

With this crowd, I have learned, over and over again, that nothing is real until you see it in a court order.

Obama will judge shop and have it overturned.

[MMaschin]

I see your point, but I ask you this: if the judge was determined to enter a default judgment that just says “Obama shall not be on the ballot”, why did he allow the plaintiffs to proceed with proofs of Obama’s eligibility? If it will have no effect on the resulting judgment, why would he waste the time? He just seemed like a really no-nonsense guy and not likely to just indulge the plaintiffs only to throw the transcript and the exhibits in the trash. We shall see, we shall see...Let us pray that there is some hope for those of us who have been agonizing over this travesty of a president.

In the case of an appeal, only evidence presented at the original trial can be considered. The plaintiffs very likely made the request of the judge to have their evidence in the offical record.

Once the hearings started, I was very happy, because I thought that there would be no default judgement, and the judge would rule on the evidence presented, and thereby have a ruling on whether or not Minor is precedent on NBC. But that does not appear to be the case. I pray I'm wrong, and that the judge rules based on the evidence, but I don't see how he can, not if he was ready to make a judgement before he even heard evidence that Obama Sr. was never a US citizen.

The problem with the Georgia statute is what was origionaly considered a plus - that the onus is on the candidate to prove he is eligible, not the plaintiffs to prove he's not. The problem with that is that it allowed Obama to do what he did here - simply default. We need to find a state where the voter has standing to question the eligibilty of the candidate, and is required to prove that the candidate is ineligible.

The only way to win this battle is to force the courts/media/and public to recognize the real definition of NBC.

[jaydee770]

>>...Unless I’m mistaken, this was to keep Obama off of the primary ballot, not the general election ballot...<<

That is my understanding too. I’m wondering if we will have to go through all this again when the general election comes around. But, since a candidate for Pres has to go through the Sec of State to get on the ballot in GA and presuming Obama’s eligibility-proof remains reasonably and prudently questionable, I do not see why the Sec of State would allow him on the ballot for the general. Perhaps he will allow him on the General ballot just to trigger the same challenges again? If he does, I hope he does it early, rather than late. Who knows what will happen? Keep your popcorn handy!

The BIGGER question to me is: Which other state(s) will go next?

[353FMG]

Now this is a cause that I gladly contribute money to instead of the NRC or other GOP groups that constantly show up on my caller ID.

[Munz]

there is no democratic primary this year

[gonzo]

Ping for later read ............................ FRegards

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Larousse2]

You’re welcome!

[Larousse2]

You’re welcome!

[Lloyd227]

From what I'm reading... this case may be a little different from what we have expected.

The judge is an administrative law judge and apparently he issues not a ruling in this type of case, but a "recommendation" and then, the final decision as to whether Obama's name appears on the ballot rests with the Secretary of State.

The judge does not issue any true ruling that is binding on anybody and it's the Secretary of State who is subject to the political pressure involved regardless of what the judge does recommend.

Further, the failure to appear does not automatically result in a default judgement, the judge can still rule on "the facts" as he sees them, not necessarily default to ruling in the plaintiff's favor because the defendant failed to appear.

I am suspecting this one also will be swept aside without a true ruling on the merits of the case. But I hope I'm wrong