I watched ALL the videos of the hearing, I did NOT at any time, see Taitz showing off to the cameras, and frankly, she went to great lengths to establish the background and experience of the witnesses she called to testify in regard to the documents she presented.
I object to your characterization vehemtly.
did she actually state “ I offer these witness as experts in the field of X”? Unless the attorney actually asks for them to be recognized as experts and (after any objections) they judge rules they are experts then they are not experts and can not have their testimony be expert witness testimony.