[philman_36]

...this Court considered...

Think about that for a minute.
...this court determined...

Which would you rather he have said if you were the defendant?

[philman_36]

Yes, my lower case "c" was deliberate.

[Mr Rogers]

“Which would you rather he have said if you were the defendant? “

He CONSIDERED an argument made by the plaintiffs. He rejected it, writing:

“CONCLUSION

President Barack Obama is eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary election under O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(b).

SO ORDERED, February 3rd, 2012.”

If I was the defendant, I’d be pretty happy. I’d have preferred the decision go the other way, but then, I’m not the defendant.

Remember, in the previous section of his decision, the judge wrote, “None of the testifying witnesses provided persuasive testimony. Moreover, theCourt finds that none of the written submissions tendered by Plaintiffs have probative value. Given the unsatisfactory evidence presented by the Plaintiffs, the Court concludes
that Plaintiffs’ claims are not persuasive.”