[vanilla swirl]

Good luck wit dat.

I have no hope for justice.

[Red Steel]

...immediately apparent when one reviews certain alleged "facts" which were "considered" by Judge Malihi ("Decision," p. 6). Specifically, Judge Malihi found as "fact": 1) that Defendant Obama was born in the United States; and 2) that Defendant Obama's mother was a citizen of the United States at the time of Defendant's birth. Both of these "facts" found by Judge Malihi constitute a second significant flaw in the judge's ruling and serve as the stated factual basis for his erroneous conclusion that Defendant Obama is eligible for the presidency.

"Judge Malihi" constitute a second significant flaw in the judge's ruling and serve as the stated factual basis for his erroneous conclusion

To say the least. Mahili was intentionally erroneous on the face of it.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Le Ping!

[Mr Rogers]

Here is what WKA (http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZO.html) says:

“The real object of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, in qualifying the words, “All persons born in the United States” by the addition “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” would appear to have been to exclude, by the fewest and fittest words (besides children of members of the Indian tribes, standing in a peculiar relation to the National Government, unknown to the common law), the two classes of cases — children born of alien enemies in hostile occupation and children of diplomatic representatives of a foreign State — both of which, as has already been shown, by the law of England and by our own law from the time of the first settlement of the English colonies in America, had been recognized exceptions to the fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the country.”

Let’s go thru that:

It says there is a principle “citizenship by birth within the country”. It says the exceptions to that rule are:

“the two classes of cases — children born of alien enemies in hostile occupation and children of diplomatic representatives of a foreign State” and “children of members of the Indian tribes”.

It says their discussion has shown that those exceptions were driven “by the law of England and by our own law from the time of the first settlement of the English colonies in America” - referring to the common law NBS, and the US NBC.

It says the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is intended “to exclude, by the fewest and fittest words” those exceptions discussed, that were true in the colonies as NBS, and in the US prior to the 14th as NBC.

Thus you have A & B, where the set of all A is identical to the set of all B, thus A = B. Or in this case, A = B = C:

“citizenship by birth within the country”, excepting “children born of alien enemies in hostile occupation and children of diplomatic representatives of a foreign State” and “children of members of the Indian tribes”, and that was true in the colonies under NBS, true after the Constitution under NBC, and true under the 14th by intent of the writers in saying “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,”.

Some here make a big deal about slaves not being citizens, but slaves were considered property under Dred Scott, and thus not capable of being citizens. And since so many people thought the Dred Scott case was an obscene rejection of “citizenship by birth within the country”, Congress and the states passed an amendment declaring, inescapably, what they believed had always been true under the NBC clause:

“citizenship by birth within the country”.

That is why birthers get their butts handed to them in court, even when the other side doesn’t show up. YOU HAVE NO CASE!

[GregNH]

I have really been out straight and don’t see much of a break in the action. Anyway I found this but haven’t had time to research it myself, but if this is true it is extremely interesting.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2842152/posts?page=717#717

[Candor7]

I guess Obama thugs got to the Judge.Thats what fascists do, as they did in 1928 Germany.

We have slipped one notch closer to swivel warp ( civil war)

Do you think that the people will agree to be governed outside of the Constitution? Hardly.

Obama should not campaign in Georgia, its a plantation state with a need to plant.

[devattel]

I would be willing to bet Yankee currency that Judge ملیحی was a dual citizen or foreigner at birth. Either that or Judge ملیحی has children who are dual citizens, or Judge ملیحی is married to a dual citizen. That does not bode well for an unbiased decision.

[SvenMagnussen]

Plaintiff David Farrar took the witness stand and stated he was a Georgia registered voter and objected to Obama being placed on the ballot due to publicly available information on Obama’s birth location.

Court precedent indicates a candidate for office in the State of Georgia MUST prove eligibility when a Georgia registered voter complains to the GA SoS the candidate is not eligible to be on the ballot.

See O'Brien v Gross OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-0829726-60-MALIHI, at 12 (2008) "The burden of proof is entirely upon Respondent to establish affirmatively his eligibility for office" citing Haynes v Wells, 538 S.E.2d 430 (GA 2000) establishes that a candidate seeking to hold office through an election in the state has the affirmative duty to prove their eligibility.

O'Brien v Gross was a Malihi ruling. Malihi is ignoring his own precedent to ensure Obama does not have to testify under oath.

[philman_36]

I don't know about anybody else, but I can read in the letter that Hatfield is red hot about this.

IMO this will go forward.

[Drew68]

Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1.

Damn. I really should have jumped on the "separating birthers from their money" bandwagon a long time ago. It certainly has been quite lucrative to Joseph Farah. And Orly Taitz spends a lot of time sunning on Waikiki beaches.

Maybe these folks aren't so stupid after all.

[TheBigJ]

“Do so at your own peril”...wasn’t this from his memo?????? More hot air, talks cheap you friggin coward.

None of this makes sense.

The Zero regime must be using nuclear option or this government is completely hijacked and overthrown and nobody knows it yet.

This unaccountable puppet is being set up to win again and Romney set up for the perfect fall guy. Part of the RINO establishment wants Zero to win (that is squat in the White Hut illegaly again), period.

More and more it’s apparent we are in pre-restoration/revolution times and this blather is all window dressing, a legal charade, political theater; while the ruling class passes NDAA, attempts to regulate the net, it’s various police forces like FBI noting “anti-government extremists”. There’s gonna be a fight folks. Prepare and let’s win.