Squeeky, you're an ass. Plain and simple.
You're a relative newcomer to this community, yet you seem to have no regard for that fact. People here don't know you. You haven't developed any sort of rapport or reputation with us. A simple mindset of good manners and general civility is required of any newcomer to an established group. We're real people, and I highly suggest that you treat us as such.
If you don't instinctively know all this, then you've got issues with people skills, and probably quickly make enemies wherever you go. You're quickly doing that here.
I don't have any issue at all with your having a diametrically opposed opinion to mine about the NBC subject. None at all. For most conservatives, it's not hard to debate other conservatives in a civil fashion. Even when debates become heated, one needn't sink into verbal abuse and nastiness. In fact, that behavior is a common mark of one who has lost the argument. The fact that you begin your debates with that behavior is telling.
In a nutshell, Squeeky, you have an opportunity to become part of one of the most important conservative communities in the country, but you won't last long here, if you insist upon being nasty and abusive with everyone you disagree with.
1. Who says YOU are a conservative??? What do we call people who make up laws to suit their beliefs??? Uh, LIBERALS!!! Like LIBERAL activist judges do. This is what YOU are doing with your Imaginary Two Citizen Parent requirement.
2. Politeness??? Yeah, I can do polite. Problem is that the two citizen parent Birthers here can’t. Disagree with them, and they start calling you names. Two citizen parent Birthers can NOT distinguish any boundary between REALITY and PERSONAL OPINION.
All this stuff is very personal to them, so that when you point out their numerous legal boo-boos they personalize it and think someone is out to get them or something. There is a profound mental disconnect for the two citizen parent Birthers so that “what I think the law should be” becomes “what the law is.” This is why two citizen parent Birthers are sooo RABID.
3. Wanna an example of Number 2 above??? Let’s look at YOUR post here. When I mentioned the Ankeny case in post number 41 above, this is what YOU replied in post number 47. Quoting YOU:
“I’ve been a part of the Birther conversations on Free Republic since Obama’s run for office first sparked them. I have spent hundreds of hours following those conversations, and studying countless references elsewhere. I haven’t read the case you refer to, but I must say that I’m surprised that few have mentioned it, until now.”
That paragraph above is what YOU said. Sooo, YOU have never read the Ankeny decision, and yet when the Georgia Judge hands down his decision, based on the reasoning found in Ankeny, what is YOUR reaction??? Is it to go and actually read the Ankeny decision so that you might understand where Malihi is coming from, to decide whether he is right or wrong??? To decide whether or not he is following the law??? Oh H*LL NO!!!
Instead, YOU do a thread called “Who Is Judge Michael Malihi?,” and fill it up with all sorts of insults against him, without ever once even bothering to actually read the relatively short and easy-to-read Ankeny case.
See. This issue isn’t about the LAW for you and your brethern here. It is some kind of weird psychological thing where you pretend the law is what you want it to be, as opposed to what it is. Then, you plop a “CONSERVATIVE” label on yourself, and set out to preach (lie) to other conservatives here how Rubio and Jindal are not eligible, when you haven’t even read the relatively few cases that apply.
Sooo, I think you need to examine your own motives and behavior and if you do, you might come to the conclusion that what I really am isn’t IMPOLITE. I am far, far worse than that. I am PERCEPTIVE.
I say this hoping you will do the right thing and get off this Imaginary Law stuff.