Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazlo in PA
Yeah, I’m old enough to be engaged back then. That is why I find your argument preposterous. Once again you refuse to back this claim up with anymore than Rogan’s unbelievable memory where he is able to quote Santorum verbatim in a meeting that happened in 1998. The article claims he took a lot of notes. Apperently he had a steno machine on hand. You also post the FR thread, but don’t post the no name blog where this whole idea is being pimped. I on the other hand can point to the congressional record where Santorums votes on impeachment are there for all to see. How did old Rick vote on impeachment?

Let Ricky refute James Rogan's account. Oh, how I would love to ask Rick that question in a public setting. Good grief, don't tell me you were engaged.

Ricky voted on what he could later pass off as being politically correct all the while protecting the gutter snipe to stay in office. Allowing the Clintions the opportunity of planting in permanent position of government his workers to corrupt the government process. The refusal of Lott and Santorum to have live witness and the production of the evidence is NOT Christian. It is playing as the devil's advocate.

44 posted on 02/08/2012 11:23:56 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts
Let Ricky refute James Rogan's account.

Why bother. The only ones pushing this is the no name blog and you.

45 posted on 02/08/2012 11:26:41 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson