Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Romeny was worse than McLame?? are you nuts?


60 posted on 02/13/2012 4:31:26 PM PST by Mr. K (Were the Soviet-Era propogandists as gleefully willing as our Lame-stream Media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. K

No, how did you miss all the exposure that we gave to the radically, passionately, pro-abortion Mitt Romney in 2007? His rabid anti-gun aggression, his appointing of all liberal judges, only 25% who were even registered republicans, he ran to the left of Ted Kennedy in wanting full homosexuality in the military.

Romney was not a rino, he was a full fledged liberal.

Romney told the abortion movement in private, to trust him as a stealth supporter, to just get him into the White House (via Massachusetts Governor’s office) so that he could then deliver on his true, and necessarily secret, agenda.

NYT about Romney running for Governor in 2002, but referencing a greater national role: “At the end of the private session, when it became clear that the group was going to endorse Mr. Romney’s Democratic opponent, he surprised its leaders by saying he could be a “good voice” and the most effective national Republican leader on abortion, said Melissa Kogut, a former Naral official who has detailed notes from the meeting.

“I thought, ‘That’s interesting. He’s running for governor, and he’s trying to convince us to get behind him because of the role he is going to play on the national stage,’ ” she said. “We left the meeting feeling pretty good.”


61 posted on 02/13/2012 4:37:54 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson