Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36

The judge(s) would point you to that long section in WKA that detailed the evolution of NBS to NBC. There is a reason that so much of WKA was devoted to that particular subject.


266 posted on 02/19/2012 8:31:42 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]


To: Harlan1196
Simply answer the question.

Didn't even Ankeny state that Ark wasn't a NBC?

267 posted on 02/19/2012 8:34:32 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

To: Harlan1196
The judge(s) would point you to that long section in WKA that detailed the evolution of NBS to NBC. There is a reason that so much of WKA was devoted to that particular subject.

There's no evolution from NBS to NBC. The last time Gray mentions the term NBC in the WKA decision is when he quotes Minor and affirms that Virginia Minor's citizenship was based on having citizen parents. Why do you suppose he did this when it was never specified in Minor that she was born of citizen parents??

Gray's lengthy essay on NBS is to give teeth to the 14th amendment so that it can override an international treaty that otherwise prevented Ark from being a U.S. citizen. He also clearly says that the 14th amendment does NOT define natural-born citizenship:

In Minor v. Happersett, Chief Justice Waite, when construing, in behalf of the court, the very provision of the Fourteenth Amendment now in question, said: "The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens.""

307 posted on 02/19/2012 12:00:29 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson