Rush isn’t helping the side. He’s pandering.
Could people refrain from making remarks about Sandra Fluke’s looks, weight, sexual orientation, sluttishness and whether she would actually have any need for contraception? And stick to her playing fast and loose with the truth and with the Constitution, which is the real problem?
Not to mention Georgetown making no attempt to recruit students with orthodox Catholic beliefs, or to produce lawyers with Christian values.
“Pandering” to whom?
“Could people refrain from making remarks about Sandra Fluke’s looks, weight, sexual orientation, sluttishness and whether she would actually have any need for contraception? And stick to her playing fast and loose with the truth and with the Constitution, which is the real problem?”
We could but what’s the fun in that?
If the Democrats want to trot out someone who basically admits to being such a slut that she can’t afford birth control as as their best argument in a debate over the Constitution, and the law student in question goes along with it, I say fair game. Not only is she a slut, she’s an ignorant slut.
I agree, Heartwood. When people start name-calling, it lowers the level. I do think Rush was making some good points, however. Fluke obviously has to be full of crap. $3K a month!!! And these are women who can afford law school. Who is going to feel sorry for them? Seriously. People are out of jobs (and bigtime here in Ohio where I live), and living paycheck to paycheck to provide food, shelter and the basics of living for their families. My advice is for her to drop out of lawschool so she can pay for her personal needs...and save up for law school at a later time.
Anyone involved in this is far beyond contempt for many, many, reasons. As a fan of free speech, I am also a fan of shame a ridicule for people who deserve it. Those accused in the stolen valor case and this particular person are good examples of those who have earned it.
I would also throw in the Bishop who oversees this "Catholic University."