It’s not just adoption. Under Hawaii law, the facts on file can be changed any time a judge okays it. Any number of corrupt Democrat judges could have agreed to change the vital records in 2004, 2007, 2008, 2011 based on nothing more than Barry’s sworn say-so.
I'm not ready to go so far as to say that Hawaiian officials are corrupt. I could accept "incompetent" because I have plenty of familiarity with incompetence in governmental officials, but without clear evidence, I wouldn't suggest they are corrupt.
That being said, it may be very well within the legal process to get a document to say whatever it needs to say. If they can indict a ham sandwich, they can torture a document into confessing whatever they want. :)