To: philman_36
Because Duke v Cleland says that the SoS has no jurisdiction over presidential primary ballots.
She conclude that one was not applicable because legal precedent says it was not applicable.
To: Harlan1196
Because Duke v Cleland says that the SoS has no jurisdiction over presidential primary ballots.
So she followed one law and disregarded another as it suited her needs. Got it.
447 posted on
03/08/2012 1:40:56 PM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson