If the mother is still alive, could they ammend the complaint with her name also ? Since she is party to the BC ( her name and signature being on it ), how can they deny her access since she is a legal party to the document ?
That’s what I had suggested they do when they appealed. But it seems pretty clear that HI doesn’t really care what their laws say. HRS 338-18(b) gives Duncan permission to receive a copy of the BC, and UIPA says that if law allows the disclosure of a government record, the agency HAS to disclose it. The government record is the actual paper document, and it is discloseable to Duncan so UIPA requires it to be disclosed. The director has no authority to refuse THAT requested document by replacing it with a different document.
Their judiciary is just rotten. If they do this with this request they would do the same with a request from Clara. And technically Virginia’s long-form DOES refer to Duncan, because it asked how many children had been born to Clara, and one of those children was Duncan.
Only a fool argues with a fool, which makes it really rough when your entire government is a fool. These jackasses are going to be the death of the greatest nation that this world has ever seen. I’m just sad that a lot of good people get stuck going down with the ship too. Like my kids. These crooks are stealing my kids’ future.
I have to keep telling myself that they will see justice one Day. There is a Judge who deals honestly, and they will not be able to wriggle their way out of justice when they meet Him face to face. All the excuses will melt on that Day and all that will be left is the naked truth. It’s just a matter of time.
If you want to be the one to hound an elderly woman for records of her daughter's death because you have a hunch that the President of the United States is using it in a massive coverup, be my guest.