1. He may not have ownership technically, so that answer would be true.
2. The reaction ‘may’ produce gamma radiation, but the whole thing is considered impossible by everybody and the reaction type may be outside of what any government agency considers ‘nuclear reaction’. Is there an actual physicist on here that has lab experience who could speak to this?
In mid-January, Rossi claimed that he was actively working with U.L., and that he had already provided them with working devices for their independent testing. (LINK, at 20:00). When confronted by a Florida government agent, he claimed he had not done this. Claiming that U.L. was already testing the E-Cat would be strong evidence that it was legitimate. But that was a lie.
There's also the recent revelation that National Instruments never did any technical work for Rossi and that, in particular, they never designed a controller for the E-Cat. Rossi lied repeatedly and in great detail about this for three months.
It has become obvious that Rossi has been lying about all of his business relationships. He has been using them to provide phony credibility for himself and his "invention".
It's hard to imagine that he would be doing this if he really had a revolutionary new technology. It makes perfect sense, however, if his E-Cat is a fraud.
So, did Mats Lewan make that up? Or did Rossi lie to him about it then? Or did Rossi lie to the Florida government about it now?
Whether or not he "owned" the building is irrelevant. He's been claiming for more than six months that he was engaged in manufacturing in Miami. Now, he claims that all the manufacturing is overseas.