[allmendream]

Perhaps the evolution that YOU were taught by ignorant creationist sources suggests such things.

To those who actually know and understand evolutionary theory - genetic diversity is generally understood to be a healthier trait in a species than there being only one “superior” variation.

Humans are stronger as a species for there being human populations adapted to equatorial climates and there being human populations adapted to polar climates.

There is not just one variation of human skin color that is “GOOD” and all others that are “BAD”.

That is based upon a total lack of understanding of the actual theory. Which is all too typical of creationists.

[Moseley]

No, that is what evolution teaches.

Now, it may be independently the case that genetic diversity creates a healthy population.

But what evolutionists TEACH is very specifically that animals and individuals SELECT their mate based upon characteristics that are perceived to be SUPERIOR to others. This causes evolutionary characteristics to dominate, and less adaptive characteristics to die out. That is the essence of evolution's process of NATURAL SELECTION.

While it is coincidentally true that genetic diversity provides the opportunity to choose the BETTER over the WORSE candidates, evolution DOES NOT teach that animals or individuals SELECT a mate on the basis of creating genetic diversity.

What evolution teaches to the average woman who already feels disrespected is that other women are BETTER than she is, and will be chosen to IMPROVE the human race by getting rid of her, kicking her to the curb, rejecting her, and eliminating her characteristics from the human race.