[tacticalogic]

The instructor teaching this class may well have been of the same mind. Assuming by "Dawinists" you mean "philosopical naturalists", there is nothing in evidence to indicate anyone involved in this was.

The premise of the argument presented in the article is everyone should hate "evolution", not philosophical naturalism, and your arguments play directly into that. Being a proponent of evolution, I'd think you'd know better.

[betty boop]

The instructor teaching this class may well have been of the same mind. Assuming by "Darwinists" you mean "philosophical naturalists", there is nothing in evidence to indicate anyone involved in this was.

On the contrary, the young lady who objected to what the professor was saying may have been the only person in the room who was not a "philosophical naturalist." I do feel fairly assured that the professor was such, and therefore a Darwinist as well (and thus very likely a materialist; the two just go hand-in-hand, like peanut butter and jelly).

I do not think the young lady's objection was the least bit irrational. It seems she understands the "fundamentals" of Darwinism better than the Darwinists purport to do....