I don’t think the Clintons would have let a death threat go unnoticed. Clinton is well liked and actually respected for some reason and still has power. He and his wife could have gone public on this and stopped the whole BO machine. Hill would have been president. After that, if anyone was murdered, it could have been used as proof that they were threatened and this would have been stopped. I don’t believe he would let this happen.
That’s a good point, and it also applies to the news media as well: if they had gone public with the threats they could have stopped Obama from becoming POTUS.
That’s one of the reasons why I think there is more to this. Here’s a link to one post about my theory: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2866680/posts?page=49#49
And I’ll re-post another here that talks about it:
He gets his power from George Soros and Soros’ communist and Islamist allies. My computer is slow and I’m headed off to bed so I didn’t take the time to read the article and don’t know if this article mentioned it, but in the full interview this gal gave she said that Soros met with both Hillary and Obama to see if they were game to help him destroy the USA; Hillary wasn’t but Obama was fine with that plan.
All Soros had to do was get his communist and Islamist allies to make a run on the bank all at the same time, throw the economic world into chaos, and then threaten to do the same thing again if anybody resisted whatever he told them to do...
Of course, there were also less-drastic threats that could be used on the more minor players. Like the threat of race riots (for politicians) or the threat of FCC/FTC annihilation (for the media personalities to think was the threat). But for the people who could really make a difference - like President Bush (whose AG still controlled federal law enforcement) or Roger Ailes (who could have reported any threats to silence the media and eliminated those threats), the threat of collapsing the entire world’s economy - right after proving he had the power to do exactly that - was enough to keep them in line.
And that may have included Hillary too. Or it could have been enough for Hillary to know that she would have to try to win even with Soros fighting against her - Soros who has said the democratic party is his since he bought and paid for it.
See, Hillary is mostly communist herself but she is also a natural born US citizen, and I don’t think even she could bring herself to wish for the destruction of the US. That’s the difference between being an American and being a foreign enemy combatant, and the Founding Fathers were pretty smart people to realize the difference.
This is all speculation on my part, but based on strange things we’ve pretty much all noticed.
I’m really wondering what SCOTUS is going to do with Obamacare. It’s being set up as likely that SCOTUS will throw out Obamacare and that fact will help Obama’s reelection chances. I’m not so sure that’s what’ll happen though. If Soros has the kind of power I suspect he does, for the reasons I suspect, then SCOTUS will probably do whatever Soros wants. I’m not so sure that Obamacare being overturned would help get Obama elected - or that Soros is actually worried about re-election even, since he could pull the plug on the world economy at any time if he thought Obama was in danger of losing the election. Obama’s public comments toward SCOTUS seem threatening IMHO.
We’ll see what happens, but I wouldn’t be one bit surprised if SCOTUS throws us all for a loop by upholding Obamacare - even after putting up the appearance that they won’t. If that happens I will consider my theory practically proven.
I think Chief Justice Roberts is the weak link. I think he is the one Soros threatened - which is why he expressed confidence in the justices knowing when to recuse themselves, even though Kagan and Sotomayor had just refused to recuse themselves in the case Hemenway was arguing (I keep forgetting the plaintiff’s name in that case. sigh) AND Kagan ultimately allowed herself to participate in Obamacare even though she would be hearing the very arguments she herself developed for the Obama administration. So in both instances she was the judge of her own self - the ultimate “conflict of interest” ethics breach. Yet Roberts actually publicly defended that. Gag. Either he was threatened into that, or he is a tiny fraction of the Constitutional defender he was thought to be. In either case he would be the weak link...
Anyway, just some thoughts before I head off to bed. G’night!