Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

“Then you must be supportive of SCOTUS upholding Obamacare, since to strike it down would be selective, rather than all or nothing. After all, it does nothing about federal control of education, the environment, tobacco etc. “

Incorrect, it is a new breach.

I fear that if the feds suddenly stop prosecuting drug crimes, the citizens of each state, who, according to polls, want recreational drugs to remain illegal, will find themselves suddenly unprotected. There are no laws extant on the books, presumably. The people they have elected and the bureaucracies which are entrenched were not elected or appointed with drug policy in mind. Therefore the citizens are vulnerable to policies being implemented with little to no say on their part.


89 posted on 04/19/2012 9:42:39 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Persevero
I fear that if the feds suddenly stop prosecuting drug crimes, the citizens of each state, who, according to polls, want recreational drugs to remain illegal, will find themselves suddenly unprotected. There are no laws extant on the books, presumably.

You presume incorrectly.

90 posted on 04/20/2012 2:51:21 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson