Replies

I knew before the primary ever started that the MSM would support Romney during the primary and would turn against him once he was the presumptive nominee. I also knew they would have more than enough ammo to destroy him. Couldn’t happen to a nicer liar.

Ditto.

And my answer to the posit I see posted in every thread pointing out that "if you don't vote for Willard (as bad as he is) you are giving Obamao 4 more years", is this:

If Willard wins it heaves the party left - permanently IMO. GOP-e will marginalize Conservatives as fringe. Forget about EVER having a Conservative nominee, much less primary candidate in your lifetime - when you will turn out and vote for whatever s**t sandwich the GOP-e throws at you. I get that there is a primary, but I also get that Willard cheated and this thing was rigged from the start.

Finally - what is more preferable?
a Socialist,homo-agenda-coddling,gun-grabbing,big-gov,open borders,abortionist [R] with a Congress that enables his agenda and no chance for a Conservative nominee in 2016?
or a Socialist,homo-agenda-coddling,gun-grabbing,big-gov,open borders,abortionist [D] with a Congress that resists his agenda and a chance for a true Conservative nominee in 2016?

Yes, its a almost a no-win, but to claim not voting for Willard is voting against your best interests is not entirely true IMO. Its a call that each of us has to make, for some its closer a call than for others. For me, Third Party upticket, best Conservatives down-ticket, 2016 or bust!

Whats more preferable? Lets see:

Romney: for Ryan budget, against SSM, supports 2nd and NRA, lower tax rates, supports ‘self-deportation’, supports Roe v Wade overturn, will pass conservative Congress bills, vetoed hundreds of liberal bills as governor.

Obama: Socialist, for SSM,gun-grabbing “fast and furious”,big-gov, wants higher tax rates, spent $6 trillion in new debt,open borders,abortionist [D] who will stop conservative bills with his vetos.