[af_vet_rr]

Get over yourself. The Hitler example was a classic morality hypothetical. We were discussing sin here, not elections.

Discuss hypotheticals all you want, but I'm discussing Romney's actual record, and it is one of supporting abortion, and that is a sin. His decision to become "pro-life" is nothing more than political expediency, a lie if you will.

[presidio9]

Discuss hypotheticals all you want, but I'm discussing Romney's actual record, and it is one of supporting abortion, and that is a sin. His decision to become "pro-life" is nothing more than political expediency, a lie if you will.

I can't see into the man's heart, but my take on it is that he leans pro-life, but showed pro-choice for political expediency.

That being said, a president's ability to affect the abortion question lies in judicial appointments. Our options are a man who promises to continue to appoint pro-abortion justices, or a man who says he won't but can't be trusted. If we are analyzing the decision on the basis of sin alone, the choice is clear as far as I am concerned.

I have told you this before, but I will remind you that I weigh the abortion issue over all other issues combined in an election. I would vote for a down the line liberal who was otherwise pro-life over a hard-core conservative who was pro-choice.