Sorry, my conspiracy gene just doesn’t go that far. First its “a birth announcement in a paper doesn’t mean anything!! Anyone could have put it in!”. Then its “its been manipulated!! The Russians (or whoever) doctored the microfilm!”. Which is it? Does it matter or not? I think this skullduggery and analysis of a fifty year old birth record in a newspaper (which wouldn’t prove anything one way or the other) is just silly.
I believe Obama is a liar. I believe he manipulated his background to make for a more favorable story, and I think there is a whole lot about his background that is shady and suspect. But when it comes to the birth announcement, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. And I believe he was born in Hawaii.
And I believe there should be no doubt whether any candidate for political office especially to be President is eligible or not. There should be no guessing, taking something on faith or such media and candidate deception. Candidates must prove their eligibility or we don't have free and fair elections. PERIOD. The USSC must rule on what is a natural born citizen or we will have doubts until they do. Heck of a way to run a country...
Which means you can add your two cents worth here without taking part in any research, 'I BELIEVE' is all it takes, right? Give us a break. Make a list, tell us - who are his parents, where was he born, what was his date of birth, what was he named when he was born?
And before you reply, think about what you have that verifies anything you are about to say. Because the answer is NOTHING!
'Dreams From My Father' is a novel. It's not an autobiography. The book has no chronology, and the characters are either disguised, totally fictional, or composites.
How did prominent scratches on a roll of microfilm disappear a month later?