Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Verginius Rufus

I can’t see any rational reason why HRC should seek anything but $150K speaking engagements. Seriously. Why? Who needs the hassle? I realize the ego thing and all that but who’d want to take this morass of a world situation on for the proceeds of three speeches a year? And it could be the same speech every time, who’d care?


23 posted on 06/01/2012 1:00:26 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (A conservative, a liberal and a moderate walk into a bar. Bartender says "what'll it be, Mitt?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Attention Surplus Disorder
The Clintons have more money than they know what to do with already.

Hillary wants to be in charge, to control. When she considers the other people who might run for the Democratic nomination in 2016, she must think it is a weak field. Who's going to run? Eric Holder? Kathleen Sebelius? Nancy Pelosi? Deval Patrick? Christine Gregoire? Some other governor? Joe Biden? RFK Jr.? Chuck Schumer? Michelle Obama? Hardly anyone is well-known and credible.

24 posted on 06/01/2012 8:28:29 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson