Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PANIC AMONG THE DEMOCRATIC FAITHFUL
Power Line ^ | JUNE 12, 2012 | PAUL MIRENGOFF

Posted on 06/13/2012 8:05:49 AM PDT by kingattax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: bcsco

Paul Ryan was on “Fox & Friends” this morning responding to recent attacks by Obama. He pointed out the absurdity of calling something a “cut” when you are just not increasing it as much as someone else wants to.


21 posted on 06/13/2012 8:40:07 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Sounds like the “Rats” are starting to form a circular firing squad.


22 posted on 06/13/2012 8:47:18 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

—What’s going on with Carville?—

The last five or six presidential election cycles I’ve noticed a tendency of the press to start writing the obituary of the losing party, only to switch the party name on the obituary four or eight years later.

IOW, Meh...


23 posted on 06/13/2012 8:48:43 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
John Anderson was there to siphon off liberal Democrats who were fed up with Carter.

Correct. And Reagan played that masterfully. Remember the first debate when Reagan and Anderson debated with an empty chair for Jimbo?

Then, having shown his gentlemanly sense of fair play by supporting Anderson's inclusion in the first debate, Reagan went on to clean Carter's clock in the next two.

Nevertheless, even if Jimbo had picked up every vote for John Anderson, it would not have even come close to changing the election results. At best, Jimbo would have picked up 2 or 3 more New England states.

24 posted on 06/13/2012 8:49:42 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

>>He wrote a book, in which he wrote that Democrats were poised to rule for the next 40 years. Now he’s one of the ones who is panicked about this election??? How can that be???

People only vote liberal after they’ve been through a decade of Pax Republicana.


25 posted on 06/13/2012 8:50:44 AM PDT by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000; duckman
This is exactly right. There are a few reasons why the media is “turning” on weak barry bastard and why the “Dems are in a panic.”

As for the press, they will certainly do exactly as you say. They will deliver their drooling maniacal support on queue at the proper time. But by “turning” on Obama now, they can later peddle the lie that they are “objective.”

Also, by turning on barry now they can connect with the morons who can not help but notice that Obama is flushing this country down the toilet. If they only parrot Obama’s outrageous lies about the economy, there is a chance that even their lonely two little brain cells will recognize the monstrous disconnect between the White House message and reality. It keeps the idiots ready to believe the upcoming whoppers.

Barry will have an astonishing “come back” in the polls scheduled for September. Count on it.

26 posted on 06/13/2012 8:53:02 AM PDT by getitright (If you call this HOPE, can we give despair a shot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: duckman
I hope all this rat panic isn’t a ploy, to let repubs think the election in the bag for the GOP. Rats trying to convince repubs not to show on election day because of a GOP landslide. Just sayin’

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

X2

27 posted on 06/13/2012 8:53:56 AM PDT by verga (Party like it is 1773)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Well, that opens up another issue. Americans, on average, don’t understand the nuances in democrat speak. To the dems, maintaining current spending levels is a cut, because they want an increase. It’s alright to point out this difference, but many Americans won’t grasp it.

OTOH, that also implies maintaining current spending levels may be all right with some republicans. And that’s its own problem. What we really need is deep cuts in spending, along with a reduction in taxes. But how many congressional repubs will go along with that?


28 posted on 06/13/2012 8:54:43 AM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

If Democratic loyalists had any logic they would panic about hime being reelected.


29 posted on 06/13/2012 9:01:18 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Reagan carried Arkansas by about 5,000 votes although Carter won the state in a landslide in 1976. Anderson had about 22,000 votes. What sunk Carter there (and contributed to Clinton's defeat as governor) was the Cuban boatlift people being sent to Arkansas.

Massachusetts was an extremely close Reagan win in 1980. Anderson may have made the difference also in Maine, Vermont, and Connecticut. Rhode Island went for Carter despite Anderson. New Hampshire went to Reagan by a larger margin than Anderson's votes.

30 posted on 06/13/2012 9:15:15 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

What a campaign theme! “We’ll do better next time.”


31 posted on 06/13/2012 9:18:50 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Obama still has two important things going for him--wholehearted support by the media, and the potential of manufacturing an "October surprise."

He has one more: Race riots if he is dumped.

32 posted on 06/13/2012 9:22:01 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: duckman
I hope all this rat panic isn’t a ploy, to let repubs think the election in the bag for the GOP. Rats trying to convince repubs not to show on election day because of a GOP landslide. Just sayin’

there are some posters [mostly noobs] who say they'll not vote in order to ... get this now... in order to minimize the mandate romney will claim after his win.

33 posted on 06/13/2012 9:29:13 AM PDT by Principled (It's not enthusiasm for Romney, it's grim determination to remove Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Give Carter every vote for John Anderson and Reagan still cruises across over the finish line with 299 electoral votes, including the swing state trifeca of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida.
34 posted on 06/13/2012 9:50:07 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Photobucket Panic? What do they have to panic about? He's way too articulate to lose.
35 posted on 06/13/2012 9:51:42 AM PDT by RetSignman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duckman
I hope all this rat panic isn’t a ploy, to let repubs think the election in the bag for the GOP. Rats trying to convince repubs not to show on election day because of a GOP landslide. Just sayin’

Considering the source and the timing I'd say you're right on the money. This is not the time for our side to lose steam and think we'll coast to a win. This will be a very close election.

36 posted on 06/13/2012 10:00:28 AM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

The only way the Dem Elite could force Obama out of the election is with a bullet... And that is the scenario that scares me the most.
The “lone assassin” will, of course, be a “right-wing racist nut” and inspired by “an atmosphere of hate.”
Obama’s stand-in will win in a landslide and have free hand to do what ever it takes suppress such “hate.”
Prayers for the vigilance and dedication of Obama’s security details...


37 posted on 06/13/2012 10:08:25 AM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
what Obama will do to make a better future for the middle class

So 0bammy will go from trying to kill off the middle class through class warfare to making a better future for it? Hussein is totally incompetent, a committed socialist and a liar. What makes the dim "braintrust" think ANYONE would believe his message?

38 posted on 06/13/2012 10:14:27 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Sworn to Defend The Constitution Against ALL Enemies, Foreign and Domestic. So Help Me GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Rush had a piece from the NYTimes months ago where it said ZEro was going to ignore the working groups and middle class and run to the extremes of poverty and wealth.


39 posted on 06/13/2012 10:38:16 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
The “lone assassin” will, of course, be a “right-wing racist nut” and inspired by “an atmosphere of hate.”

And his middle name will be "Earl".

Regards,
GtG

40 posted on 06/13/2012 1:43:33 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson