I am with you on this. But, the SC does not care and is willing to gut the Constitution so they can glad hand with the President.
“...But the SC does not care...”
It isn’t within the Supreme Court’s Constitutionally derived power to make the decision concerning another branch of government.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
QUO WARRANTO LEGAL BRIEF: part 1
INTRODUCTION:
Chapter 35§ 16-3501 Persons against whom issued; civil action.
A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.
The federal statute for quo warranto was tailor made by the legislature to challenge any person occupying any public office of the United States under questionable title thereto.
This legal brief considers all relevant issues pertaining to the proper legal use of the extraordinary writ of quo warranto to determine Presidential eligibility...
For more information, see: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/quo-warranto-legal-brief-part-1/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The U.S.Constitution states that only the Congress has the power to remove a usurper from office. Two Senators were removed this way in the 19th century.
The Congress, reluctant to take on the political ramifications inherent in investigating a usurper President, delegated its authority to the Washington, D.C., District Courts to try the usurper President in that venue. The means is by Quo warranto.