Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rogue yam
Rogue, you are dissembling again. The gub'mnt took it from my pocket and put it in theirs ~ then they spent it on something they didn't say they were going to spend it on.

They used the vehicle of a public bond to cover their tracks. At the same time when they take a dollar and send it to someone receiving Social Security they retire that dollar from the pool of bonds that constitute the debt TO Social Security.

There's a $6 trillion overhang of funds collected but not spent on Social Security.

The fifth amendment says ~ bwahahahaha ~ "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation". Get over that hurdle and we'll talk. In the meantime I think I'll review the two or three cases undergirding the federales prerogatives regarding social security ~

56 posted on 06/18/2012 10:55:09 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

The “private property” spoken of in the Fifth has nothing to do with taxation. It refers only to real estate confiscated for public use. The Constitution speaks elsewhere of taxation.


90 posted on 06/18/2012 12:10:52 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Obama must Go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson