[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

Voter turnout often decides elections. I was just calling voter turnout an indirect vote.

How much more clear can it be that if the voter turnout is poor for a candidate, his opponent benefits by being able to win with that many less votes. Or trying to be even more crystal clear for you, if one candidates voters do not turn out, then the election is handed to his opponent.

So yes, it is entirely factual and truthful that when a Conservative fails to support the GOP nominee, then he is helping the opposing Democrat candidate win.

This is clear as day.

[Finny]

Whether or not Romney or Obama wins is up to those who endorse them with their votes. We third party voters will serve ONLY to weaken the victor's mandate, a postitive thing for conservatives in Congress regardless of who gets the presidency. Only an entitlement mentality -- that the GOP is automatically entitled to conservatives' votes -- would see that as "helping" Obama, whose own Democrat voters are as poised to reject him as Reublicans are poised to reject Romney.

It is clear as day, and it is also clear as day that Romney is an enemy of conservatives. You can vote for the enemy if you want and rationalize it as you please, but it will still be a vote FOR liberalism.

It is clear as day.