Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

In some states, the local party has to swear to the eligibility of their chosen candidate. Maybe this isn’t the case in Tennessee, but what would be the point in nominating someone who ultimately is NOT eligible for office unless that party is admitting they intend to break the law??


10 posted on 06/22/2012 7:49:05 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: edge919
I see this as a sign of Liberal mental illness or cognitive dissonance or something along those lines. They don't want to know the truth. This is another form of Don't Ask Don't Tell.

Perhaps Obama is ineligible, but Tennessee isn't going to try to find out. Perhaps they hope that Obama will get enough votes that no one will have courage at the federal level to say "Stop! You can't be president!" After all, that is what happened last time. Pelosi signed two pieces of paper, artfully declaring Obama was eligible. John Roberts muffed the oath of office then had a do-over in private. There is plenty of evidence that at the highest levels they know Obama is not eligible and they do not care, because they are afraid of race riots. So, as long as states like Tennessee don't ask too many questions about eligibility, he can be put on ballots, he can be nominated, and he will just be waved on through to a second term.

12 posted on 06/22/2012 7:58:22 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson