Replies

I have always been a fan of Walter Williams!

The irrefutable fact is, the Roberts' opinion is incomplete without him identifying the specific tax allowing the federal government to impose a penalty upon a citizen of Florida, or any state for that matter, for not having health insurance.

I see many Democrat voters are just fine with the federal government and Obama exercising an unlimited taxing power unrestrained by the limits of imposts, duties, excises and the requirement that direct taxes require an apportionment. How sad and unpatriotic.

Pam Bondi needs to file for a rehearing under Rule No.44, Rehearing and have Roberts identify the specific tax allowing the federal government and Obama to impose a penalty upon a citizen of Florida, or any state for that matter, for not having health insurance.

What upsets me is our media personalities and talk show hosts may not realize the importance of having Roberts identify the specific tax he alleges is connected with the Obamacare mandate. Has anyone heard any discussion by our Sunday talking heads concerning the specific kinds of taxes allowed to be laid by Congress and the limitations upon each? How about the 26 State AGs, have any of them questioned which tax Roberts is referring to?

There is a 25 day period to for Pam Bondi to file under Rule No. 44 and the clock is running out!

JWK

The big winners under the Obama/Roberts’ mandate are thieves and parasites ___ all others pay cash!