Replies

So which is it? Is it what you said in your previous post: "Please do not bother to reply to me as it will probably only make us both dizzy."

Or, when I commented to "ALL" -- and let others at least know who's comment I was responding to -- I then get castigated for not replying to???

Will the real Txnuke please stand up?

Too bad you don't love Christianity as much as you hate Mormonism

You need to be more convicted in your own belief before you can lash out at others......but on the other hand, IF you truly believe you wouldn't have to lash out at others, would you?

You said you stopped reading. Sure enough. "But a reply may have some entertainment value" I said. Sure enough.

you have a screen name since 2001. No fault for you there.

90 percent of your posts are anti-Mitt or anti-Mormon. I find I agree with them almost without exception. So I cannot fault you there.

IMHO, about 10 percent of your posts are supportive of Obama in some ways. Its almost as if you accept the precedent of someone getting elected with no vetting of their religion (his perfect Arabic recitation of the Muslim call to prayer, which is the same as the Muslim statement of faith). Now that we have elected someone without regard to their religion, you refuse to recognize the precedent you seem to accept with Obama!

IMHO, each and every post (I skimmed several hundred of them, and that got me back to late June of 2012) is taking issue with other freepers, quibbling over words, arguing with those who are compromising a true Christian faith by their acceptance of Mormonism, or otherwise calling someone out on their lack of evidence of Obama's Muslim faith.

It would take quite some time (as far as I can tell, I am not really interested in looking at the same stuff over and over just to find out what month you started posting about Romney and mormonism) to figure out when you had ANY other issue to discuss.

I am no fan of Mittens. I am no fan of Mormonism. I consider myself a flawed Christian. And I compromise on things too often. But a Mormon is a person and I have friends who are Mormons. Like Mark Twain (paraphrasing): Its not the parts of the Bible I don't understand that concern me, its those parts that I DO understand! And so, my sins of omisssion may far out-number my sins of comission. Just as my apathy is greater than my activism.

But so far, voting against Obama is a clear winner for me. People seem to want to argue about who to vote FOR. And thats okay, I guess. I think almost any Republican (is Ron Paul a Republican?) would earn my vote. Who do you suggest?

The primary is not over until the convention is over, no? Do you support anyone as passionately as you oppose Romney?