The Daily Pen article claim is that evidence has been discovered that both the Bomford and Barry BC’s were in the BNA archive. Obots got access to the archive and constructed a new composite fake BC for Barry preserving most of the correct Kenyan information, but substituting key record identifiers from the Bomford BC.
The Bomford family image on the web may or may not have been the source of the Bomford BC, as the article says the Bomford BC was in the BNA archive along with the Barry BC.
Which I imagine it quite automaticially would have been, the Bomford birth was in 1959. What the Daily Pen needs to find out is WHEN the Bomford document was accessed. If that access was say late in 1963 or early 1964, then you can take it the document was used to produce a forgery for the divorce and custody. If access was sometime around the period of the Bomford kerfuffle, in 2009, then it would be safe to assume the document was accessed from the BOMFORD FAMILY WEBSITE.
You write as if there are TWO ITMES on the record in the archives, is that right? One for Bomford and one for an OBAMA? Can you explain that?
One would certainly be the original Bomford record, the second would be the for the child of the kenyan which he took to back to Kenya with him. You know who I mean.