It sounds to me like it is questionable whether Zullow was even wrong. But if he was, it's simply an error of no consequence. I didn't watch the video, but I question why a code would change from "Non-white Other" to "Not Provided".
We should indeed be truthful, but what evidence was presented that Zullo knew the 1968 codes were different than the 1961 codes? I thought the 91 year old lady who signed the president's birth certificates were in agreement that the code meant "Not Provided'.
Well, I’d say watch the video and you can answer your own question. Please remember that sometime after 1961 the meaning of number 9 was changed to mean, “Unknown or not stated” and it still means that today-But it did not mean that in 1961. Verna Lee is 95 years old. She may have forgotten that 9 meant something else in 1961. We never heard the tape, so we have no idea what she actually said to Corsi. He may have asked her a leading question to get a desired response-We just don’t know. At any rate, two different 1961 documents are presented in the video, and they both show that there was no code meaning, “Unknown or not stated” in 1961.