Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: scottjewell
The children had no say in this unnatural arrangement of conception.

Actually, no child ever has a say in his/her conception.

But I do agree with the overall sentiment. It is in no child's best interest to place them by whatever means in non-traditional families. Doing so reduces children to the status of property, and that is just plain wrong.

15 posted on 08/20/2012 2:25:41 PM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

“Actually, no child ever has a say in his/her conception.”

In a Christian purview, they actually do. For within this framework children conceived are done so within a sanctified union of man and woman, who create him or her naturally, in a state of love and commitment to eachother and to God. Isn’t this why up until about the 1960s marriage was considered binding for a lifetime, meant to be entered into with grave and somber regard, with children as God’s gift, to be lovingly guided and nurtured? Has the Pill, no-fault divorce, recreational sex, and gay rights not torn this asunder?


23 posted on 08/20/2012 5:19:33 PM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson