[grundle]

It is now Saturday afternoon - Ebert has had 24 hours to see this since it was released to the general public - and still no review. He reviewed seven other movies this weekend.

[humblegunner]

Maybe you should spam the forum with updates every thirty minutes.

[humblegunner]

This is your 4th spam thread on the same topic:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2922600/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2922685/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2922715/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2922799/posts

[UB355]

Give it up, the film was never made available for local review. Just go watch the movie, who gives a rats a** what ebert does.

I swear there is a full moon at FR this weekend.

[Vaquero]

He is socialist scum. Why would he?

We know who he is and he knows who he is. Nothing to see here.

[ladyrustic]

Why do you care so much whether Ebert reviews this movie?

[Moltke]

Is Ebert under some kind of legal or moral obligation to review the film or why do you keep reposting this crap? OCD?

[napscoordinator]

I just watched the movie. Maybe Ebert fell asleep. Lol

[montag813]

I would rather Ebert NOT review it. I LOVE that the Hollywood establishment has been stunned by the massive turnout for the film. As Al Pacino’s character said in ‘The Devil’s Advocate’: “Never let ‘em see you coming”.

[x]

My first thought was: They must not have had a free buffet ...

... but maybe he gets his food in liquid form through a tube nowadays ...

Anyway, Ebert's a hack, a Hollywood lickspittle, God bless him, so it doesn't matter what he thinks nowadays.

[EDINVA]

what in the world does “opens theatrically” mean?

[unlearner]

Dear Dan from Squirrel Hill,

Thank you again for your loyal following of my film reviews.

The reason I chose to not review the politically conservative movie you mentioned is, as I mentioned before, I am a communist.

Yours truly,

Roger Ebert